Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
勒布朗监制的大片，其实主演埃尔南戈麦斯打得还行，空间型3d也是有地方可打，希望现实中也牛掰起来。华子演的还不错，未来可期~
这题材很难拍难看吧 对于我就算拍成纪录片我都可以 老詹要是客串了就好了
华子怎么演这么low的角色...拿人家小孩开刀的垃圾话作为故事转折也太离谱了...这种畜牲谁碰到都会情绪激动的好叭，已经超越了喷实力垃圾话的范畴了，nba球衣可是能监听的，这个设计有点蠢了，被辱骂直接告诉大众谁会不支持波？
典型鸡汤片，但NBA浓度实在太浓了。
亚当桑德勒回归耶，好多球星没认出来哈，看完想打篮球了！
詹姆斯联合制片，NBA官方大力配合，亚当桑德勒再次贡献精彩表演，新老NBA球星各种客串，虽然故事单薄了一点，但是还是踏马的足够热血，篮球真是一项有着该死的魅力的运动。
亚当桑德勒适合演这种 少祸害我们屎尿屁了以后
好看，轻松流畅同时又工整套路的好看，剪辑非常利落，拍出了篮球比赛的节奏和韵律感。即便现在已经不打篮球了，依旧能够被部分情节燃到。Adam Sandler演得好，是不是又可以提名金酸梅赎莓奖了。
难得黑人演一回恶人小瘪三。
除了一帮真球员上场以外，也没啥特别之处，主要我不是篮球粉，可能很多细节看不出来，很多球员也不认识。总归故事中规中矩，跟同类型比较区别不大。PS：因为是桑德勒就是喜剧吗？！6.6
好久没有看到这么激动人心的体育励志片了。故事很老套，但是导演和编剧却很老道。所以整体工整但是没有很算计的感觉。亚当桑德勒演的是真好。
作为一个篮球迷，太熟悉太亲切了。这种1vs1的模式，能够刻画得更细腻些。凌晨四点起床训练，一下子就哭了。
x2
洛杉矶湖人当年的球队管理层剧本给76人演。这个阵仗真的很气派了。
6/10/2022 中间训练的montage光看我就有被累到
这是看过所有NBA球星参演的电影里，大家演得最自然的一部了
Juancho Hernangomez本赛季代表凯尔特人一共出场19次，最长出场时间15分钟，最高得分4分，被交易到国王队前，3次面对76人均未出场
还行。ben这是带了头套吗脑袋这么大 1080P 22/06/09
【B+】费城球迷狂喜，第一次看到以费城篮球为背景的体育电影。大量的nba球员和元素加入客串，绝对是nba球迷的狂欢。故事剧情也不是公式化的老套剧情，虽猜到结局，但是期间大量的冲突剧情细节设置得非常巧妙，增强阅片新鲜感
亚当桑德勒本人比这部电影更励志，一把岁数了寻求转型突破，原钻没得奖就继续拍球探，可谓是中年人的明灯了……可惜这部片预计依然得不了奖，倒是看着还挺流畅，但是太工整了，四平八稳的套路，唯一的亮点是片尾师徒赛场见
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
