Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
“来酒店的人们都戴着假面，这里绝对不仅仅是一个华美的地方。酒店员工为了让客人享受到幸福的时光，一直都在守护着大家的假面”
两个小时又臭又长，大神和麻酱和上一部一样完全没火花，我不知道为什么能拍第二部。大神竟然还靠这片得了霓虹影帝，看不出有多出众。《检察官》里的演技好更多。这个剧组是真有钱，请了那么多大牌，麻烦多给点钱给编剧好吗
比起悬疑片更像是一部酒店员工培训片。不要说讲好一个故事了，连悬疑的气氛都搞不出来。这导演以前还导过古田任三郎呢，怎么像一幅不会拍悬疑片的样子？
麻：当时针分针12点遇到 爱再也停不了
前面那部好歹是乱中有详细的支线，这次就纯粹是搞成一锅粥，营造各种奇怪的烟雾弹。前后设计两场探戈不知道有什么意义，更让我在意的是那位名字叫做曾野昌明的男人，最后他的两个女人一个被捉一个面临生命危险，儿子都被警察叫去问话了，而他却去个便利店结果一去不回，成功被所有人遗忘。麻生久美子有点惊艳到我，气势不减当年，还多了许多时间带来的韵味。
依旧是布达佩斯饭店镜头梗，这个饭店风水不是很好。
真勇啊，一打八，内卷严重。影院不上让人很无语
一个中国人拍的电影里居然有为鬼子哭泣剧情真是奇葩
本片改編於東野圭吾同名小說，為《假面飯店》的續集，依舊是木村拓哉與長澤雅美的男女主角陣容。此片相比前作，節奏有些緩慢，但更突出偵破案件的主線，與前作以大酒店為背景折射人世百態不同，本片更像是帶有大酒店背景的犯罪推理片。此片最大亮點放大了前作中的戲劇碰撞，木村拓哉為首的警察與以長澤雅美為首的酒店工作人員的兩種不同職業操守的衝撞，各自立場的博弈充滿了戲劇上的張力，相反論推理元素反而中規中矩，無甚亮點。
经典阖家大联欢，乐趣完全是建立在在认卡司和找演员上
和前作一样能看，但是总差一口气，结局太磨叽…
片头跳探戈的长泽雅美是近几年最美的长泽雅美。木村哉拓饰演警察时颇有当年华仔的气质。酒店的布景和全篇的摄影以及运镜让人有沉浸式的度假感，有《布达佩斯大饭店》的感觉。另外，片尾以中世纪油画形式再现影片中的经典场景，艺术性又上了一个台阶啊
可能是看了假面饭店的意犹未尽，虽然评分差也还是看了这部。但是不知道为什么反而感觉其实并没有那么差？总感觉推理线反而好过上一部，然后也没有上一部的那种每个人物来个问题然后推进，总得来说风格是不一样的。这个更连贯的感觉。一开始又来剪头发的那个画面很搞笑哈哈哈哈哈哈。
东野圭吾的推理……有时候就是建立在“小聪明”上。本来是个三星电影，但是我太喜欢木村拓哉和长泽雅美搭戏了，强行加一星，哈哈。
少了第一部的新鲜感，却还算紧凑的剧情，终于在开天眼式破案中瞬间崩塌。
书也读过，不算是东野圭吾非常的作品，这部电影也是，可以看也可以不看。演员阵容豪华，但剧情说真的也一般。
和小说一样，前面略有些冗长了，不过后面反转，还是很精彩的。最近也开始对木村拓哉有点上头
很烂，我们的麻酱老婆，你们的大神老公，嗯，那又如何？毫无cp感。然后，尤其厌恶那个转场镜头，毫无意义，而且不止一次使用，被称为无技无法的技法。至于剧情，推理破案？一塌糊涂的无聊作秀。整个剧情松散离谱还不如某些年轻导演处女作。唯一可看处恐怕就是期待各女配角们的出现吧！
洋泡泡有用，
比起悬疑片更像是一部酒店员工培训片。不要说讲好一个故事了，连悬疑的气氛都搞不出来。这导演以前还导过古田任三郎呢，怎么像一幅不会拍悬疑片的样子？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
