A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
很有腔调的黑色电影，一家被素食主义者攻击的肉店，把素食主义者做成肉贩卖，整个第二幕围绕着伪装成素食主义者以便接近食材展开，但是杀人比吃人要刺激多了，肉店老板娘只好勾引食材，以达到激励老公奋发图强，制作培根和香肠需要有膘的食材 ... 等等不一而足
原作的温文尔雅不见了，变得分裂惊悚，编剧画蛇添足又自作聪明。一定要看茨威格原著。
法国导演拍的恐怖片，一点也不恐怖呢，还挺幽默挺sunshine的。
改编挺大。小说主角半场之后才出现，电影一开始就卯准了。茨威格的小说大量心理描写，用镜头语言就是B博士的幻觉。
和我爸一块看，我爸跟我说：“要不？咱爷俩喝点……”
多年以来都感叹这么好的作品没人改编电影，看完本片才知道，改编难度之高真是匪夷所思。
虽然后面的情节有点分量轻，但演员太给力了，翻译太tmd给力了！黄秋生的人肉叉烧包哈哈哈哈哈
人生的含义是什么，是奋斗。奋斗的动力是什么，是成功。
法国人真的很擅长荒诞讽刺剧，一对雌雄双煞杀人卖肉居然可以拍的这么喜感，结合动物世界弱肉强食的杀人画面尤其搞笑，且构图不错。很好的批判了素食主义者，哈哈
怎么让观众不憎恨主角呢，他可是在杀人，那是犯罪。
男主一个人撑起一部戏。两条线交错，最后ending在精神病院。导致我有些混乱前面所有的故事全都是臆想，还是酒店的部分是真实？
这是百无禁忌了，现在可能只有法国人敢这么做了。言论自由或政治正确的边界在哪里？整理了几类台词，按个人接受程度递减排序：1，“蔬菜万岁”“学黄秋生（人肉叉烧包）”“完美的谋杀就是没尸体，不埋不烧，顶多拉出来”“现在停手好可惜，破不了连环杀手记录”“素食者和他们（炫富的同行）谁伤害我们最深？”；2，“真主至大”“杀猪的女儿跟吃素的人处对象，就像罗密欧与朱丽叶，就像以色列与巴勒斯坦”；3，“变性人最棒，因为最好的牛肉是阉牛肉”“女人和黑人，两种新口味”
PPS:所以有没有人给我科普一下汇率……感觉他们肉好贵啊……
为了讥讽素食主义，无厘头的故事令人很难入戏。
剧本太妙了。让极端素食者、极端女权、性变态者，都死远点去。一堆变态。或者把它们杀掉做成肉食卖掉或吃掉，也是不错选择。哈哈
如果有遗憾当然是那个明媚午后，胸前流淌着草莓味儿融化冰淇淋的小维尼了。那是何等美味啊～多汁滑嫩没有世俗过分侵扰的不寄存情绪毒素的肉身～这所谓毕生遗憾！手里的汉堡索然无味……肉是有等级的！而我吃的一直不好。
感情的混乱、无形的压力、象棋的故事三篇特别好，其他也维持在较高水准。
其实镜头语言和剧本结构比不上《新鲜》，但画面和台词上的恶趣味确实一流，所以对于我来说，可能更喜欢这种流畅的爽片（？）。80
片子想面面俱到讲很多东西，但感觉很多东西都没讲深，只是看个乐，关于讽刺素食者麻烦多事这点，我想说双方都没有体会到对方感到快乐的点在哪里，就说这么多。结尾上升到了道德和欲望博弈的高度，又加上了一丢丢的循环意味，这就是我说这个电影还行的理由。
写这个剧本的多少和素食者有点私人恩怨，真的好搞笑，有一段假发都打掉了，我服了！牛🐮说是婚姻恐怖片也没什么问题吧！！！！导演现在就是我心里的法国王子川了等于是。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
