Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
真闹挺，第一次尝试看直接看睡着了，为了不浪费那一小时，过了段时间又接着给看完了🙃
三个狠人的戏，整体情节都挺流畅，动作到位，个别情节和人物比较突兀。
很娱乐的片子，虽然不想太纠结情节逻辑，但是结尾女主开急救车🚑那一幕我感觉有点多余。
爽片，骗子和杀手的剧情设定不错，动作戏也好看，感觉差一口气，可能张力不够，应该可以拍的更好看。
如果不是杰拉德·巴特勒在封面，这就是个烂片，镜头处理的很好，但剧情太拖沓，不是无聊时间一定看不下去，还不如去看同一导演的天龙特攻队呢
马修对发便当有着愈发病态的迷恋：上一秒还是1917式的硝烟洗礼，下一秒就成了毫无重量的角色牺牲，这种调性上的急转直下不是詹姆斯古恩在自杀小队里那种无所谓的态度，更不是特工学院有理有据地自我调侃，而是实在编不下去了，就任由毫不相干的元素干扰观感—-尤其是第一幕戏说历史环节像是走马灯一样地记流水账以后，突然毫无逻辑地迈进卖腐与恶趣味并存的妖僧遭遇战，虽然各种调度和机位上的巧思还在，却完全没有他以往的血脉贲张，只有眉头紧锁和wtf，一次又一次拨弄着观众观影的阈值和底线，马修绝对玩爽了。即使第三幕有拉尔夫和杰曼瀚苏博了老命地打、搞笑以致敬007来挽回颓势，却为时已晚，如此毫无章法大面积地毁灭角色就像是把地基炸毁后再重建，这绝对不是来自他对自己掌控力的自信，顶多算是对才华和信誉度嚣张任意的挥霍罢了。
还是那句话，打发时间看一看可以，出彩倒不至于，剧情在紧凑一些更好
无能同事领饭盒，唯有黑妹只手撑。
《续集不该存在系列》《中老年特工成长记》《不卖腐不是英国人系列》
有些剧情有点扯但总体来说值五星，扣一星给主角光环太过分以及大哭桥段太多有害身体健康。哭得多刺激？那一瞬间剧情我都在电影院里不能克制地“嗷”出来了。导演是个搞笑的人，不是那么严谨但是值得一看。
太难看了，从来没有看过这么烂的开头。看了30分钟实在受不了退场了。无处不在的配乐真的很烦很烦。
2.5 not tactical and plz get glocks
警匪无脑片，故事背景设简单，但是来头不小，骗子掮客、FBI、坏警察、好警察！超级职业杀手，女警察很酷，角色塑造分明，看的出编剧导演水平在线的，流水线片，看一个打打杀杀，低成本，有这样效果，还不错。
及格吧，中间杀手之间浴室互搏那段太暗了，看不清。
虽然无法超越第一部，但比第二部来得好。整体还是水准之中，导演的镜头语言运用得依旧成熟，说故事干脆利落，对白精简却极具深意，斗武的方式华丽有趣，最重要一点，那个爆点真的太爆了，完全在我的预料之外，简直无法相信故事后面没有反转！
人如片名，这一次陷落专业户也不算主角。剧情总体还可以，有时候有些啰嗦，警察为懒散付出了代价，重置密码的速度是真要命了。
枪战场面更是不值一提
《续集不该存在系列》《中老年特工成长记》《不卖腐不是英国人系列》
女警，彪悍派！人物个性鲜明，但故事张力一般。20211119；
一颗星给杀手不砸墙的理由是因为他的职业是杀手，而他已经很努力的杀了三个人了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
