这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
An absurdist classic
This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.
老旧的故事看角度和拍法，如果从头到尾都是vintage的话，那确实只是一份平庸的复制品。
影像气氛迷人，风格上很像去年A24出品的《绿衣骑士》，但没那么闷。
作者自我表达和作者自我沉迷是两个完全不同的事，我感觉导演明显分不太清楚。下次再有这么大笔钱，真的不如给我，我雇个导演拍闺蜜的北欧同人小说，保证比这个好看多了。@好莱坞
Rather than the story itself, Eggers is more concerned with a certain way of filmmaking - let’s say a certain level of visual intensity and an innate authenticity inherited in folklores and mythologies that makes that type of storytelling the dominant narrative form in western cultures. That way he can get deeper into what those cultures are.
合着拍了两部恐怖片但是终极梦想是拍这个对吧？救命，2022年了，我为什么要看一个15岁男孩在2002年写的自我代入同人？还两个小时！没有那么差，我相信会有人喜欢的，也很容易找到点吹（很容易产生一篇内含50张图的流量影评），但对我来说真的很折磨，毫无惊喜甚至后半程内心毫无波动，what a cringefest.
艺术，性
当痛觉消失，当手术刀切入身体成为一种获得快感的途径，当人类可以随意操纵自己的器官
拍出韦斯安德森的味道减一星。对本片感兴趣的欢迎去看我在豆瓣阅读的连载，我也是北方人。
纯白的电影。imdb评价高大概源于对政治正确的逆反？6
演技场面可以，不懂纳维亚传说会看得一头雾水。
Saul身体的美丽寓意着罪孽
大概能明白为什么北美口碑和票房呈现两极的趋势 简单的故事用了一个古典的叙述方式拍出了很多古装片没有的史诗感 套用了大量宏伟的自然风光 拼贴式的魔幻特效 片子是非常的华丽 加上深藏不露的长镜头和神调度 投资不会少 过慢过深的推进又让片子呈现一种花大钱拍文艺片的感觉 评论圈会觉得这片子是艺术品 观众会觉得这么简单的故事没必要装深沉 就很遗憾
虚实交融和长镜头令人想起伊纳里图的《还魂者》。 诡异民俗的梦呓和嘶吼、星光下的屠杀和交媾。受自然和神灵引领支配的复仇之旅，冰冷国度与炽热火山上的宿命之歌。（口音太重+口齿不清导致很多台词没听懂反而意外加强了某种仿佛神志不清的浸入感🌚）
杀戮场面讲究“原始”，民俗神话色彩添味。写实与写意，这两方面观感上联想到《荒野猎人》加上《麦克白》。艾格斯个人的视听风格依旧。其实完全可以用更极致的做法，观众甚至不需要听懂人们的语言，仅需身临其中，借助长镜头，简单到只去感受“影像”故事即可。★★★★/8.1/*2
这种导演拿到更高预算应该是一件好事，可是就像《灯塔》里解构普罗米修斯令我不齿，还原王子复仇的原型我亦看不见生存还是毁灭的答卷，又或者，艾格斯的答案过于反文明且黑暗，我不想看见？
柯南伯格是真的对（被割裂的）人体有着近乎神圣的着迷，而平和稳定摄影则将这种美感与神圣准确传递给了观众（不管是否被接受）至于表达，不能说完全理解了，感受到了一丝现代科技与政治不太光鲜的链接，以及宿命论式的身体进化悲观论。柯南伯格（化身为影片中男主角）先是悲观，然后流着泪接受。
故事中最带感的冲突点是男主妈这个角色，妮可基德曼飙戏看得很爽，加一星。
电影的节奏很稳，实景、音乐，长镜头和妮可基德曼饰演的王后及其设定都是加分项。故事就是简单的报仇故事，不新鲜，但是这种文化历史的厚重感还是非常吸引人的。在此感谢一下游戏《刺客信条·英灵殿》，所谓北欧神神叨叨的风俗习惯，在玩完游戏以后基本已经了解了，更多的注意力可以放在电影本身而不是纠结他们的文化了。
说实话这种欧美古装剧看多了就觉得食之无味弃之可惜，A大的身材还是很好的，全程看肌肉
按部就班的北欧血腥迷幻版王子复仇记，人物都仿佛毫无感情的脸谱化的提线木偶，除了大型展示恶劣生存环境下黑暗时代文明边缘的残忍之外想不出有什么别的意义了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
