Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
看完原版电影《迫在眉梢》后无缝连接地看了这部，我记得原版电影短评有用最多的一句是：「这种片子在内地上映注定要被河蟹的。」这可不，故事背景又选在泰国了，哈哈哈哈哈哈。真的是很棒的改编哎，陈思诚真的有点东西啊！通过插叙的方式 把戏剧的冲突和张力发挥到了极致，原版平铺直叙的把生活困苦的男主角为心脏病儿子劫持医院急诊室的故事 拍成了一部平庸的现代医疗保险的公益宣传片。对于原版电影《迫在眉梢》中的很多关键情节做了改动，非但没有变得很离谱，反而有了新的剧情反转。原版中父亲劫持医院急诊室是因为医疗保险的不公正对待 在这里变成父亲想要为儿子夺回心脏的清晰动机，原版中出车祸的心脏捐赠者 在这里变成了抢走心脏病儿子的权贵人物，原版中抢救儿子的心脏奇迹般地从天而降 在这里变成了父亲近于自杀的就义后器官捐献给儿子。
好久没看金相庆演戏了，感觉这个片子里他有点被限制发挥。整个电影其实拍得挺糟糕的，差不多是以一种最笨拙的方式在讲这个故事，浓浓的电视剧质感，只靠最后那20分钟意料之中的所谓“反转”把人吊一下（但是现实生活中真的会这么理想吗？比如男主角答应作证带着隐藏摄像机进入实验室不会被安检吗？“反派”有这么傻？）。当然结局还是能煽你一下，这也是韩式类型片惯用的套路了。看完只觉得，这样的故事在咱这基本上也是不陌生吧，但哪怕都拍成这样了，我们也只有远远看着的份，所以就也没啥好说的。
既然是翻拍的，为什么在央视上宣传的时候还说是全新故事？？？有这么恶心的么？ 后续：看过了之后觉得被陈思诚骗进去的，除了肖央演技以及反转还行以外，就给俩字，可耻。
俗套、平庸，这样的作品实在想不出来有何生产出来的价值。
结果半毛钱关系都没有
中午吃饭前刷抖音偶然看到推荐就上网找了看了，感觉中规中矩吧，没想到代表会帮助好人的一方一直还觉得可能没办法治得了这个企业，会以悲剧收场。
“我们老老实实做人，为什么赢的怎么总是你们？”食利阶层若是不赢，普通百姓可能就活不下去了！
假装在泰国系列，如果继续是翻拍的话其实翻得还算合格过瘾，改天有空补起原版，想想咱们强国就无法大大方方地多产产这类商业片，而要一再拿来，都对周边小国类型片审美疲劳了要，配乐音效算优秀加一星，文咏珊演技太烂了又减一星，彩蛋可还行，假设彩蛋为真，那这位父亲确实应该转行别再当编剧了。真正的黑暗根本让人看不见，还是泰naive.
影片介绍：《误杀2》，改编自筷子兄弟歌曲《父亲》，由主唱之一的肖央倾情演出，以及“好爸爸”陈思成微笑监制（两星），致我们终将逝去的父爱（两星半）。
属于可看的一类，有反转有鞭挞，但人物刻画缺乏真实情感的烘托，过于描述化。
最近个人体验感悟，《误杀》已经不是某个片子了，而是一种国产类型片的模板：东方内核的复仇母题，始终牵动着观众的情绪，推进情节，然后结尾留有余韵。可惜还是翻拍，希望下一次我们的国产编剧可以来一次真的自证。
看了《误杀2》信纸上写信那一幕，就一直在想“萤火微光”这个词。用自身的光芒和能量，去照亮周围、甚至给身边人带来希望，能把悬疑剧的题材拍出这么好的社会意义、能体现出每一个像林日朗一样看似平凡却不平凡的人所具有的亲情羁绊，这部电影真是很不错了。
这个分数很合理 肖央饰演的林日朗 既要完成作为【劫匪】强势、让人惧怕、使人有危险感、甚至让人信服他会杀人，又要展现作为【父亲+丈夫】角色的深沉父爱、隐忍的丈夫，引起观众的同情，这样的角色设定太难了 导致片中观众的情绪一会是惧怕一会是感动 医院外的群众一会为他喝彩 一会又鼓动警察枪毙他 这样的情绪是不合理 也无法使我信服的。但是影片总体要传达的东西很值得肯定 人性 权力 生命…如何抉择…谁的生命更值钱？生命是平等的吗？这一点值得肯定
以后自己写剧本吧真的
泰国人说中文，中国电影放泰文歌，我到底在看什么啊。而且这个系列也别叫误杀了，就海外大片翻拍集吧
你说看过1000部以上的电影，这世界上压根没有什么离奇的事情
前面看着确实有点平淡无奇 后面十分钟才感觉进入了重点
祝韩国电影越来越好吧
七颗星吧，这种真实事件改编的电影，往往能引起人们的共鸣，只是看演绎的怎么样了
肖央连扑两部，误杀2和谁是凶手，误杀1和人潮汹涌积攒的好感荡然无存，这部从台词到剧情都烂的可以，台词又直白又尬，演技总体不咋地，女记者最差，这么老套的故事真的没有拍的必要，强行煽情，一把假枪骗了整个泰国，这种故事好像2000年以后就没看到过了，梗太老了，肖央真的可以尝试下其他类型角色，你的绝望悲伤崩溃麻木每部都一模一样，真的好失望啊，没想到这么差，第一部有多惊艳这部就有多失望
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
