Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
感觉还行，整体还是不错的，感兴趣的可以去看看
恐怖片生存法则与现实结合完美，揭秘的过程中吐槽了一堆IP续作重启花式扑街（如绝命圣诞夜、鬼娃回魂、月光光心慌慌、电锯惊魂、终结者、侏罗纪公园、捉鬼敢死队、星球大战等，这个揶揄的桥段非常Cute），退休警长纯粹是工具人领便当，坏蛋依然死于话太多，全智能家居安防系统你值得拥有。
让我们一起向永远无法超越的第一部致敬！向韦斯·克雷文致敬！！[B-]
很矛盾，我一边在嫌弃女主的无能狂怒，一边又在悲痛女主一家的无助。
Jane Austen的爱是奉献，是长久的折磨
太有梗了，没想到还能看到黑袍纠察队的男主。
有点像达科塔·约翰逊的独角戏，男主太弱了，感情戏没撑起来的感觉。
正视历史时间线，别再在这种题材里插政治正确了，五颜六色的演员等于出戏
女主拥有果敢，坚强的性格，不惧困难，的令人佩服的精神。
打开前担心改的不如老版，看完后发现也还可以，几个大场景都和2007版的保持一致，女主很美，最美的一版，男主不尽如人意，配乐不错，风景很美。
“以牙还牙，以眼还眼”这是手无权势的老百姓孤注一掷的最后方式，惠英用推土机推倒了父亲守护的不愿被夺走的饭馆，无疑是本片的高光时刻。有人评论韩国电影“什么都敢拍，但什么都实现不了”，“什么都”改成“大部分都”倒是挺对的。扣一星因为父亲赌马的人设。
我可以说我永远爱简·奥斯丁，是她让我对爱情充满了幻想，是她拔高了我的择偶标准。
220130 - 剧本逻辑太差，Ghostface大兄弟身娇体软易推倒造成奇怪的笑点，血浆太少，反正全程基本没被吓到，我最怕的jump scare都不吓人了，反而那对母子把我虐到哭了一会，就离谱。我都已经在乎逻辑到对“在电影院看恐怖片”无所畏惧了吗……？想找好看的恐怖片是我的错还是世界的错？（。
采取了独白的形式进行演绎，有点类似《伦敦生活》，2022版为简·奥斯丁的剧本赋予了很多现代气息，挺先锋的。这种跳出式的对白，利于启发观众思考，不代入任何情感，理性观影。简·奥斯丁刻画的所有作品中都有一位独立坚强的女性。这就是爱情Yes!别让任何人告诉你怎么去生活，没有标准可言，不管你认定的爱情多么的离经叛道，它都是你的爱情。
2022年了喂，为什么交互界面还能那么丑啊？
年纪大了，已经不大能接受无脑看只追求刺激。bug1，医院停电or拉闸，居然没人发现？1家医院只有1个保安+1个病人？？？bug2，警长老妈第一时间叫支援回去保护儿子，结果自己都送人头完了，警察也没来？而且你可是警长啊，居然打不过一个高中生？大白天的死在大门口，隔壁左右也没人管的。。。帅哥好友看见他妈的未接来电也不管，只会傻盯屏幕就完了？不会回个电话么，力气没凶手大，剔裤裆会不会，脑袋歪一下会不会？真是被桶活该。bug3，人被烧成那样了，是真的不会咚咚咚的气势汹汹的冲过来的
不太忠于原著，把Anne给改成更符合当代“剩”女的戏谑样，连对二号男主的讽刺也少了很多
达姐好美哦！男主真的很乡野莽夫，和Elliot一起更来电吧？不懂男主哪里配得美女了，选角有问题扣分
这样的剧里还要体现政治正确也是不理解了。但是风景，音乐和女主（虽然不符合原著）都很美，可以一看。
这年头，能有演员不整容不打玻尿酸真是难能可贵；全片仿佛都在过家家，虽然为了配合“剧情”一度有些“反智”了，但这捅刀子的冷饭炒得起码比《生化危机》强啊，几段犀利的自我嘲讽和小吐槽还是深得我心的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
