Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
内心的博弈在影片中化为两个角色的人物关系，有些深度不足
三星半吧 喜剧部分略优于惊悚部分 有些情节设置太蠢了 不可信 节奏偶尔拖 有掺水嫌疑:)。。
前半段真是搞笑得不行，特别是三个逃犯在阁楼藏着拉屎那段！想起来就 想笑😂😂😂😂😂😂表演得太感人肺腑了！哈哈哈哈哈哈！后半段就好吧，夸张的剧情。就是一部，你以为是严肃悲凉的婚姻戏，结果是一部搞笑肤浅的荒唐婚姻加肤浅人性之搞笑视频！哈哈哈～～一对夫妻彼此都仇恨到想搞死对方并实施的地步，即使为活命携手奋斗结果也只能说，钱才是最重要的！贫贱夫妻百事哀是真理啊。
这就是我心目中喜剧电影应该有的样子，尽管出现了不少bug，可影片全程高能几乎从头爽到尾，还顺便表现了婚姻生活中最极端的一面。
太矫情了。
哈哈最后问了一句 你是怎么把桌球藏起来的 而且还是三个
【黑米影库】相当非主流的作品，血浆的恰到好处，喜剧的恰如其分，3个油腻男的出现把全片带入了高潮！
还以为是个普通的婚姻故事，没想到这么血腥暴力还+点无厘头。
感觉比起史密斯夫妇的装逼更有意思。印象深的一段。。。隔壁老头絮絮叨叨的绕了一大圈才跟他老子提到家里可能遭贼了，这一段拍的真有趣😅
后半段挺嗨的，结尾也有意思，顺带调侃了时事政治与好莱坞，连北欧大力推进的新能源汽车也有梗。
糟糕的开局，但北欧电影人实力的体现就在于能沉得住气，后面故事叙事还是有板有眼的展开。即剧本完整度和最终展现度还是可以的。
喜欢这部片的推荐另一个，失踪顺序 Kraftidioten (2014)，一样是北欧血浆喜剧，做得更冷色调更黑色一些，一样的好看。
非常血腥，女主很强大，男主老爸的台词很搞笑。
cult爽片就是图个过瘾，细节不探讨了。
还以为是个普通的婚姻故事，没想到这么血腥暴力还+点无厘头。
杀妻杀夫黑色幽默加逃狱三王屎尿屁，最后黑人出现给我笑尿了，补叙的手法不新鲜，有趣的是各路梗王的集合现场。
爽片，仅此而已。 太血腥，比起昆汀又整得四不太像
斯密斯夫妇黑色幽默版，一对出现婚姻问题的夫妇，前往一个遥远的小屋重新修好，但他们都有杀害对方的企图。就在他们执行计划前，意外的访客来了，三个逃犯在这个小屋的阁楼上，他们面临着更大的危险，最后杀死了三个逃犯，然后把自己的经历卖给了好莱坞，塑料夫妻开始又正常生活
向盖里奇，昆汀，B级片，希区柯克致敬…还算是诚意满满的喜剧作品。
黑色幽默的cult暴力的高效小题材，but风景真的不错。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
