Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
比5年前的自杀小队能力上更新颖有趣，波点人第一次出招时好灿烂，但竟然最后被拍死！！老鼠女能力太不适了，小丑女刺入海星时配合老鼠咬东西有被恶心到
一旦接受了这个设定..剧情自圆其说就好。经典反美的美式电影。又当又立。暗黑萌物鲨鲨快点加入豪华恶人帮吧
Apple+自家的影视和苹果的工业产品一样执着于硬朗的流线设计，没记错的话，《芬奇》也是这样小规模，少演员的搭配组合。苹果本身就是接近于科幻的一家企业，类似近未来的题材可以说是得心应手。我们的科技越是发展，越是接近伦理的边缘。我们仍可能忘记在还能掌控的岁月里将时光与家人分享
虽然对美国百般嘲笑，最后还是回到了人性主旋律的价值观嘛。随便架空这个岛国确实容易搞事，只是大海星死的有点快。
7/10.
要如何面对另一个自己
其实是非常老学校的一部片子。不惊艳，不难看。
There is as much heart as heartlessness in this
极慢的叙事节奏，细腻的人物描写，Mahershala Ali精湛成熟的演出，虽然Swan Song走的不是软科幻人文的新路，但这路走得却格外稳健踏实。
导演像嗑药了一样，拍的太嗨了，各种小包袱抖得真是喜欢极了。
画面好美。
没有想像的好看，没有从头燃到尾，有一种抗日神剧的味道。开始派的一队以为是王者结果直接ko，后来才是真正的队伍，这次的小队明显较弱。最好看的地方就是几人潜入一个地点时团灭了他们但发现是女主的亲戚们，后来几人去大反派的老巢。那里的动作戏挺多，各种楼塌的情景拍的挺好，最后打大五角星有点恶搞的味道，还是被一堆变身的老鼠进入吃掉，最美的地方是小丑女进入眼睛中。
前半部分有点审美疲劳了，后面还好。罗比太美。
从致敬巴顿将军的大国旗和快速推拉镜头开始，这种影视怀旧技法就像玛格版哈莉奎因，不知道还要消费到几时🤔
7.5 制作稳定的软科幻，当我爱你的时候，是我的记忆还是我的肉身还是我们在一起的感觉让我确定我爱你
密恐+老鼠恐+深海恐+血浆肠子恐的我，全程数次一眼毙命。以及，剧本套路到，几乎猜中了每一个转折。不过哈利奎恩真的真的真的太可爱了！
不应该如实的死去吗
如果“我”是值得信任的
从我身边远去
一旦接受了这个设定..剧情自圆其说就好。经典反美的美式电影。又当又立。暗黑萌物鲨鲨快点加入豪华恶人帮吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
