Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
从细腻深刻的家庭戏，到热血激昂的竞技场。从奥运冠军光彩四溢的夺冠时刻，到生活窘迫全家拮据度日的难关。本片涉及的点面颇多。讲述母爱的同时亦有在关注更深层次的议题。同样是冠军，残奥冠军既不被关注，又得不到同工同酬的待遇，令人唏嘘不已。讲述母爱也不是一味催泪或者形象单一。母爱亦有冲动，亦有偏颇，亦有一意孤行。与弟弟所获得的母爱相比，哥哥因为“特殊”而倍加受关注，母亲对他多有疏忽。以对比的方式呈现出一个更立体的母亲形象，不再是刻板的、浅薄的、脱离实际的母亲形象。别的不说，本片至少是全方位吊打《超越》了。
上帝全知视角，生怕观众看不懂么？为了反转而反转，也是国产此类电影的另一通病
感觉有点模仿九号秘事里有一集倒叙 十分钟往回倒一下 但每往回倒要推翻上一个十分钟呈现出来的大概故事猜想 有点为了迎合这个设定剧情上就很牵强
张继聪、梁仲恒、杨伟伦和胡子彤等演员，贡献了真实而又接地气的演技。
三星半。非线性结构的悬疑片。范伟演技没得说。窦骁算是个惊喜。
短短107分钟里，我见识到了无数个所谓的"高能反转"，一层一层的视角转换，空间人物的堆叠企图能用诺小的格局来提升内核，玩一出悲伤的《疯狂的石头》。结果呢？拍的十分土气，哈欠连天的硬核反转，一个小时的电影活生生拍成了社会问题。剧本素质，导演控场能力不高，硬要升华，刻意转场，视角堆叠，以及反转都让我频频白眼。
东拼西凑、乱七八糟的拧巴故事，很像《全民目击》那类伪悬疑垃圾，完全没有剥洋葱的快感。自以为是、自作聪明、自我感觉良好，结局当然是自食其果。
文本层次稍显贫乏，部分段落重复闪回剪辑拖泥带水，大概30min就能概括的故事容量，尽管形式上用了诸多巧合与设计推进。论以非线性多视角花式解构黑色幽默，还是宁浩玩得最溜。
3.5 渐入佳境的一部，前面太多的造作，后面把问题一抛出来就好看舒服的多了。（什么时候原声版港台片能和原声版进口片一样在大陆影院普及，国配太毁体验了。
罗生门结构，密闭空间营造出紧张的情绪加上不断加入的新人物本应能产生激烈的化学反应，慢镜头的滥用以及剧情最后的谜之走向，使得四星的优秀作降维打击成三星片，审美方面在新人导演里算不错的，剧本明显是能看出下了功夫，不断反转，善与恶都在眨眼间转换。如果打拐线能够变为贩卖人体器官线，全员恶人，一黑到底倒是会符合我的口味。本片为了过审，将结局特意改成伟光正，以致最后一个反转非常生硬，不得不说这是很遗憾的处理。有点期待，棒子如果买了这个剧本的版权，他们会怎么样处理？我觉得没必要跟《疯狂的石头》对比，剧本结构完全不同，另外一方面，之所以大家对《疯狂的石头》赞誉有加，其实占了观影先后的先机，如果大家先看的是《两杆大烟枪》，《疯狂的石头》是不是就没那么好呢？
却是拐卖孩子的人贩子交易现场。
A large bamboo basket of stupid thieves.
哎呦，出来混还是要心存善念的，即使是个贼也要盗亦有道。挺合格的商业悬疑片，3.5分比较合适，还挺黑色幽默的。
实际上只是巧合的堆砌以及编剧放料多少的问题而已。配乐还不错。
密室剧本杀，不停的反转，一帮演员演绎的一集综艺。不必太认真， 认真就输了。毕竟同类型太多，要突破很难。6.4
好好看！好多地方都感动我，没有可以煽情，很现实！收获良多
感动固然是有的，这当中看到了当妈的各种牺牲奉献精神，而爸爸永远缺席…弟弟的存在更让人心疼
《疯狂的石头》
两星半。本身倒没啥大问题，问题在于让每个演员都演出了生涯最差。
果然與預期一樣，有好幾處都忍不住眼淚，可能是因為真人真事的緣故，真的很難不受觸動。沒想到少年演員與青年演員都一樣那麼出色，演得太好了，媽媽也是，真實到讓人都以為他們就是本人。同工同酬、弟弟受冷落發脾氣、做了奧運冠軍家庭條件依然困難、出去做快遞員比人鬧、特殊小孩的特殊成長歷程、如何做一名普通人、媽媽那些或許錯誤的選擇與無條件的付出，都是從很小的細節中表達出不服輸的拼搏精神。殘疾人真的太不容易了，殘疾人的家庭也太不容易了，致敬所有用心努力生活的人。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
