Sixty Glorious Years is an exercise in the creation of iconography, both for Victoria and its star, Anna Neagle (who subsequently became known as 'Regal Neagle'). Just as Elizabeth I commissioned artists to create flattering iconic images for public consumption, so this film performs a similar function, for Neagle is more beautiful than the real life Victoria. Controversial events (such as the 'Irish problem') are omitted and unpleasant aspects of Victoria's character (her petulance, arrogance, favouritism and 'right to privilege') are glossed over as endearing little 'whims'. Albert acts as a moderating influence when she goes too far.
The film followed a year after the highly successful Victoria the Great (d. Herbert Wilcox, 1937). Again the screenplay is by Miles Malleson and Robert Vansittart, and many of the supporting cast (the cream of acting talent of period) repeat their roles, this time for the colour cameras. This was the first full length Technicolor film of cinematographer Freddie Young, who captures the spectacle of royal weddings, grand balls and opulent interiors, with scenes actually filmed at royal palaces. Vivid battle scenes, set in Alexander Korda's empire territory (Sevastopol and the Sudan), rival those in The Four Feathers (d. Zoltan Korda 1939).
The title music sets the tone: a regal choir sings over a shot of the crown. Elgar's 1901 'Pomp and Circumstance' march is heard during the diamond jubilee celebrations and, as Victoria's coffin lies in state, the film concludes with Anthony Collins' stately music accompanied by the text of Rudyard Kipling's 'Lest we forget'. Combined with the emotional appeal of scenes of Victoria connecting with her 'ordinary folk', this is stirring stuff.
The film connects with contemporary events of 1938. The release of two celebratory royal films was intended to boost public affection for the monarchy in the wake of Edward VIII's abdication. Anglo-German relations were another touchy subject. With another war on the horizon, influential voices wanted appeasement, and the film could be seen to fit that agenda. Victoria herself was of mainly German descent, nicknamed 'the grandmother of Europe', while Albert is a 'good German', charmingly played by Anton Walbrook as a cultured, decent man.
Sixty Glorious Years now seems unduly formal and reverential. Had movies existed during Victoria's reign (they only emerged at the end) this might have been the kind of film produced. Unlike Mrs Brown (d. John Madden, 1997), it is all so very 'Victorian'.
Roger Philip Mellor
不太了解法国的庭审程序，既然有陪审团存在，那么被告旁边那个穿红袍的法官是个什么角色？貌似他的话对最后的量刑起了关键的作用。
章子怡＞吴京＞沈腾＞徐峥 主旋律得也太假了些，我都尴尬了～ 章子怡打孩子那段算有些真情演绎
前半小时对家庭关系的琐碎铺陈让我以为又是一部关于欧洲中产阶级内部世界的情感流动故事，但后面罗生门的展开让它变得更有意思。没有去呈现任何一种客观事实，但却分门别类地整理、陈列好了所有主观事实，不仅仅是所有局外人都无法窥见事实的本身，甚至当事人双方的视角都可以截然不同地描述同一件事，面对根本无法厘清的黑白对错需要有怎样的指向，这是庭辩戏发展到2.0模式之后需要去思考的地方。
的确比TV版强一些，早能料到剑悟醒来第一句会说斯麦路斯麦路
当初泽塔没有剧场版大伙都以为圆谷在整个大活，新生代迪迦啊，可让大伙期待了，结果人坂本确实给你整了个大活嗷。
电影前半段节奏有些拖沓，直到庭审开始。在整个庭审过程中，有许多很让广大女性和男性感同身受的台词。我们不得不承认两性之间天生的力量差距，如果一个男性对女性使用暴力，那么这个女性基本是很难去对抗的。当她被要求口交、脱掉裤子、抚摸乳房的时候，她或许会因为恐惧而不敢开口，害怕受到更多的伤害而服从对方的指示，但沉默不是同意，不要不是欲迎还拒。性一定是在彼此相爱尊重的前提下，“上帝看两个人相爱无处表达，才创造了性”。
通过原被告双方的对质，当事人和律师的讲述，逐渐展现了事件及当事人双方的心理状态（说谎，隐瞒等等等等）
和之前看的最后的决斗好像哦，但是事件更罗生门。导演也许并不想掺合所谓的女权，就如片名人间世事各人立场不同看的角度就会不同得出的结论也会不同。
跟《最后的决斗》像是约好了般同时出现在威尼斯，后半段也让人想起拉斯·克劳梅的《审判》。问题跟《最后的决斗》相似，前两幕只负责操纵观众心态的摇摆，第三幕的出现直接否定了前两个视角存在的意义（与《最后的决斗》不同的是，本片只有最关键的派对情节被隐去）。此外，母亲知名女权主义者身份所带来的矛盾在她说出“这会毁了他”之后便被不了了之，它与电影中其他所有次要矛盾一起被偷懒地省略、自动化解，故事以一组看似中立开放实则说教的punchline作结，这样的处理并不像是在激发思考，更像是偷懒的创作者把烫手山芋藏进土里，一种两面都不愿冒犯的圆滑（胆怯）。
对女孩要温柔。两种不同文化，不同阶层的人对性对玩的理解是不一样的。喜欢被告律师结案，正义不需要战士，它需要的是公正的法官。对结尾完全同意原告主张的审判既意外又不意外。
章子怡的《诗》拍得很细腻，跟其余三个篇章明显视觉不同。父亲告诉孩子，自己的职业是在天上写诗；父亲死后，母亲承受丧夫之痛，坚持钻研航天事业及独自抚养孩子——这苦难而又没有诗意的生活最后却是用诗来读给孩子听的——女性细腻真挚的浪漫情感很打动人。
2021年法国的《最后的决斗》，缺点确实是拖的太长；导演很明显并不想草草下结论，试图给两方视角，庭审戏很好看，但是穿插的上帝视角在这时候并没有作用，已经知道发生了什么；no和yes在这里显得更加重要，庭审的意图在这里也很明显，终述说的在清楚不过
前边看得云里雾里，各个人物分散讲述，中间才串起来故事大纲。
没有拒绝，就不算性侵吗？有意义吗 还要拍一部电影出来
在新生代剧场版里可以排个第三，可以看出武居的进步
章子怡的最细腻，反而第一个最尬，表演的痕迹太重了，端的太明显；每一项成就的新闻背后，有无数个默默风险的个人和家庭。
最近的剧场版都堆场面堆角色啊。 一代版本一代神。 泽塔这身越看越像兄贵。
suck me，bitch！怎么办我真的很喜欢
反正剧场版时间不长，放给我儿子看的，我反正觉得好傻，特效好垃圾，道具也很敷衍
本子真不错，一个罗生门的故事但其实双方的行为都符合既定人物个性和生长环境的逻辑和语境。这会让一个看似只有噱头的故事特别的丰满。大量的时长拉满了人物的复杂性和故事的迷雾。但其实就是简单的两个人和一件事而已。高级。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
