A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
用一种奇药，讲述的又都是凡人情爱，倒是看腻了苏那样的人设，如果是爱，为什么不在一起呢？明明来得及，明明有条件，有勇气去追梦，无勇气去相爱。丁教授还是挺可爱的人，真实有趣。
能看下去的话还是很有感觉的，看似来回跳转切换，其实这就是生活。当然演员们表现都很好，不过这个导演拍的乱七八糟。
这不是写实电影，这是魔幻片。感觉看了好多内容，又好像什么也没接收到。救命啊......
影片还是很真诚的。
蒙蒙雨过去看，淋着雨回来了…
长生真的好吗 那样世界会不会乱了 我猜想人类应该具备这样的条件也不会付诸行动
第三：女主的设定是一个没有底线的女明星？？ ？ ？？？是只有这种女人老去才值得惋惜？
迷影细节特别多 周星驰9527 《这个杀手不太冷》Mathilda造型 哈利波特假死的国王十字车站 等等等等 票友啊导演
这个故事可惜了，当时还以为会是一部黑马。唉，被导演拍砸了。
很少打两星，但这部是真剪的乱七八糟。剧情衔接令人尴尬，王朔的那一套碎嘴子看不下去…太压抑了
没有那么难看，也没有那么好看，感情部分有点像本杰明，阿甘正传，又有点像霍乱时期的爱情里面的感觉，但是又不够连续和混乱。王珞丹的出走没有过多的说明，只能说小时候没有得到父母的爱，长大了变得谁都可以爱，也许。
7分。故事够长，够沉浸，有些桥段太用力，过头了反而效果不好。喜欢王传君和王珞丹。
好电影一定是能调动情绪的，调动情绪的却不一定是好电影。如果导演想要表达人生的混乱、无序与终将失去的话，无疑还算成功。一切都是离别、一切都在失去、有情人成不了眷属、明白总要晚一步。
苏凌芳是怎么知道丁萌萌和郭小鲁计划过要生个女儿起名郭萌的呢？
干细胞有点太扯了，我以为他会老老实实成为一个好的外科医生。
干细胞相关的戏过于重了，喧宾夺主，而且让片名里面「奇」的意境被消解掉了，王朔风格强烈的对白给影片加分不少，前半部分还是不错的。ps，真没看出那是王啸坤！这角色真好，会让人期待出场的那种好
我终于get到王珞丹的美了，真挺好看的，王啸坤很意外啊笑点都在他身上了演的真不错，王传君哭起来也太难听了，前半段好看，从萌萌下线之后这片子也跟着有点飘了，总的来说还是值得一看（其实看了两遍
强行把俩故事凑一个，也不是不可以，比如《I型起源》里极为出色的融合，但本片缝合能力差，从年代爱情到科研实验的过渡交接处理几乎没有，以至于片尾强劲的煽情攻势处于浪费状态。王朔台词还是有水平的，但是老男人的YY也是够了，少些自我感动，删掉半小时废戏，再改个片名，本来片子很有潜力，李婷婷王珞丹的表演都挺给力，命题也够宏大，可惜的。
不太像爱情戏。
看名字还以为是本杰明巴顿奇事那样的，原来是科幻。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
