Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
冗长且蓄意，一杯好酒也不必塞到我嘴边来喂我喝
场面宏大震撼，节奏紧凑，无数普通战士为国牺牲的精神令人感动，像他们致敬！
用真实、震撼、感动来总结这部电影，《长津湖》值得一看！
很喜欢伍万里的成长线 从一个江边调皮少年被迫成长为一个战场英雄 片中几处笑点都来自于他 看他从被大家调侃时的不服气到后期投出空爆被大家认可的过程很欣慰见证了他的成长 也意识到他已然成为了他一直想成为的一名真正的英雄
隔山隔水打嘴仗吐口水的俩邻居，见天的互相揭短秀肌肉。“老子不怕你，又不是没跟你打过，还打赢了好吗！”
很幸运，去参与了“33城首映”，想说的好多好多，但简而言之，就是值得我们每一位去看！
太震撼了，为了我们的下一代，这场战争我们必须打”。
整体还不错，有段描绘长城山峦波澜起伏的景色很亮眼。剧情有两波高潮。很然，很爱国主义，很国庆档。
特效，万里的戏份有点出戏，用力过猛。还是胜在历史意义。
三个小时的电影节奏很紧凑，完全不觉得时间长。打仗也要学好英文！
千玺这次塑造的角色再次颠覆了我对他的认识，万里跟小北和韦一航区别很大，万里从江边的野孩子成长为英勇顽强的志愿军战士这个过程，期间的各种变化被千玺演绎的非常好，有几处眼神戏太抓人了，非常惊喜，真的是有无限可能的天才青年演员，我给满分👍！
最后有点意犹未尽，结束的太快了点，如果结尾有个情绪抒发的点就好了。战役过程特别是第一场战斗过程稍微长了点
看之前觉得会哭，看完觉得影片度把握的很好，没有刻意的煽情。荡气回肠，气势磅礴。基本上近2个小时的镜头交给了战争场面，音效很赞。但穿插着人物性格描写部分还是透着兰晓龙独特的军痞风~群像之下，写的最好的人物是胡军那个人物，有血有肉（啊！胡军演的太好了！）。四字弟弟完成一个85分的表演，害怕的时候我相信他真害怕了，但坚毅的时候我从他眼里看到了执念，未来可期。
事迹本身所带给我的感动或者激动远大于影片所传达出来的
敬畏战争，才能珍惜和平，一个年轻共和国的立国之战。将近三小时的片长，却让人看得酣畅淋漓。不吹不黑，片子很精彩，叙事结构张弛有度，剧情相当紧凑，毫无尿点。拍出了战争的残酷和人性的反思，而不仅仅停留在鼓吹胜利，真正的战争没有胜利者，人文思考这个层面可能有诗人导演陈凯歌的功劳。另外战争的场面和动作的方面，也相当给力，对林超贤和徐克来说应该算是驾轻就熟了。另外演员的表现也实在出色，可见选角层面也是精挑细选了，基本集齐了国内影坛硬汉，还有实力派小生，文戏情感细腻，武戏强悍硬气。比较遗憾的是结尾显得比较匆忙，全靠字幕带过，不过这也是续集水门桥攻防战令人期待之处啊
比预期好点，也就好一点吧。那群在冰雪里冻住的人更值得书写。如果战争只爽，痛苦一笔带过，会让年轻人有很多不切实际的意淫
第一是前面大多数时间是以点代面，这个点还没讲完，后面就突然跳跃到大局观，这个点没了前后呼应。就像听了两小时武松打虎的评书，最后十分钟就讲到了梁山招安。
上敬作战英雄 下敬涂炭生灵 愿人间再无战争
电影还是美化了一点，现实更加残酷啊...而且前期胜利之后面对的是更恶劣的环境，想到这些，就没办法因为电影结尾挥舞旗帜而高兴起来。咋说呢，中秋看的1950，实在太受震撼太难过（就是在电影院忍不住哭出声的那种），看长津湖的时候就没有那么触动。艺术本应高于现实，但往往真实更加触动人。可能1950之后，再难有抗美援朝电影能超越它了。毕竟老兵越来越少，下一次讲故事的还有谁呢。
三个半
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
