Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
坦白说，意外的还不错～整个一印度战狼～不过摄影和表演真心不错，同时这挂开得，笑得咱前仆后仰的～很久没看过这么一本正经又如此搞笑的片了～～～有一说一，阿三挺能装逼的～一枪崩辆小车空中转体960度啦～飞天火摩托引爆弹药库啦～一把草药瞬间骨折痊愈啊啥的～太多了，最逗的还得是那段合体抗嘤。这动作设计，真不是一般人想得出来的～哈哈哈哈哈哈哈～另外毕姆受难记唱的那首歌还挺好听的～其实三哥的作曲实力一直都很不错，宝莱坞的歌舞和美术肥肠的牛批～
印度抗英神剧，虽然剧情过于无脑爽，但是画面感十足，印度电影的工业水平的确已经很强了
两个人是一支队伍，虽然很无厘头，但是特效，爽剧，还是很可以的。
飞檐走壁 力大无穷的 干就完了 挺有意思
阿三拍这种大场面神剧真是手到擒来
虽然套了个凯奇演自己的壳，但本质上还是个中年危机电影，拍得太规整太意料之中了，哪怕学点《波拉特》或者《我仍然在此》，稍微玩得疯一点，而不是嘴炮式的小调侃，这部片可能会成为神作。
可能是一种奇妙的自黑情怀，我们的观众对印度的神片，总带着一种莫名奇怪的美化滤镜。就是尴尬到脚趾扣地，不合理到牛顿压不住棺材板，都不妨碍大片大片的印吹打出四星五星。除了极致的浮夸和无脑，这部电影的什么优点能值四星五星？
虽然三个小时但是节奏竟然很可以，虽然无视一切物理规则但是看完很是感动，只想大喊一声：拉朱毕姆结尾的歌舞为何竟不是在你俩婚礼上！
RRR.2022.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.x264-Telly
而且这片很多桥段很“琼瑶”很超级英雄
各种慢镜头开挂的双人阿三组合，抗英阿三，战狼阿三。
合理性先放一边，场面、特效、画面和动作设计等等，肾上腺素拉满，装逼中二无极限，所以是好看的～
我想知道印度电影有低于一个半小时的吗…太gay了 每次跳舞的画面出来
不得不说阿三片子的分镜设计是真的赞，视觉冲击力拉满，特效也越来越好了。
印度的史诗英雄片视觉真是独一档，英殖印时期都能玩出史诗级的感觉
感觉国内演员和阿三的一比都差一大截，至少人家能实打实的跳一段
有点雷，但是比大多国产好，结尾的罗摩神附体一般算是魔幻现实主义，热热闹闹
m22110：小老虎和《勇士》男主角，音乐还不错。
今天的中国动作片怎么可能拍得过这个。。。差实在太远了
一言不合就跳舞，
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
