Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
一个man必须用野蛮、自私、幼稚、自大、虚伪去向womem勒索爱和裂缝，man被想要不断复制自身的原罪牢牢锁在脑中，永远期待有一个专属women来崇拜跪倒在自己脚下。
形式做到极致 但符号化太过于明显 直接喂 最后这个套娃真的….一丝丝不适
怎么说呢，是那种好到让你心生厌恶，而心生厌恶恰恰证明了这部电影成功之处的作品。
太cult了…想看又给我恶心到了，最后我麻了…a24调色还是很牛逼的
有种在双年展的小黑屋里看当代作品的观感……我的理解是女主ptsd的各个阶段？片头是小写白色的men，片尾则是大写血红的MEN，精神分裂般地控诉性别压迫。蒲公英是什么，是看似无拘无束却注定飘摇的反抗精神。
！！！！男人可以从任何“洞口”生出男人？？那一幕真的，怎么他们的表情如此痛苦？孩子不是神赐予的生命吗？🐶
从这部电影的标题开始，它就只打算“简单直接”，因此这也形成了这部电影“完全恐男”的基本盘，这样的性别议题反思并不能算到位，只是用了一个《逃出绝命镇》似的外壳重复了一种恐怖类型片的拍摄模式。影片的优点主要是导演对心理环境的把握以及源源不断的图像隐喻上，从苹果到乌鸦到蒲公英，从绿色静谧的女性空间到隧道口突然出现的裸男，其中有些太过直白，不过最后的男生男与丈夫的伤口倒确实是一处妙笔，代表了父权社会遗毒的代代延续毫无改变。除此之外影片在恐怖类型处理上并不算高明，导演很明显过于依赖自己在情绪段落处理的优势，结尾女友的视角其实是可以给人最后一拳的点睛之笔，但也被情绪一笔带过，也让整部电影最后只能落在“情绪层面”的恐男，而无法进一步深究。全片的性别反思也就刚好达到《逃出绝命镇》似的政治正确算计。
单纯觉得电影不咋地，反正不合我胃口，不是因为女权不女权的问题。电影里隐喻的概念太多，场景也就那样吧，女主没有什么主动性是最让我厌烦的，就最开头来说，家暴控制狂老公自杀了不是应该高兴吗？看到这里我有三分欣慰，终于有男人以自杀作为对爱人的惩罚了。
但女主脑海中前夫“亡魂”对妻子说，他只是想得到爱，又让我觉得此片不止在讲述“仇男”、“厌男”，不过是从生物学和社会学角度，讲述男女充满矛盾、难以调和却彼此需要又偶尔相爱。
前半部分以为是个恐怖片，后半部分我和女主都一脸冷漠：哦，渲染了半天竟然是要表演肛生子啊，行吧🙄
愧疚、自责、压抑、害怕，伴随着诸多男性躯体终于压垮了女性。
诡异邪典，恶心，男人男人，头晕，压迫，暴力，漠视，不适
探索男人的世界，最终被痛苦折磨，但这一切的原罪源自两性之间的恒沟。爱情也许如同田园风光和漂亮民宿一样令人产生愉悦，但两性之间无法一致的取向，让对方都产生敌对的臆想，如同石像的两面。最后套娃的设定更是将男人的卑劣展示的淋漓尽致，看完之后，谁人不恐男。
一部叫做“男人”的电影，一部自诩为女人发声的电影，居然无法想象女人还会有PTSD 之外的状态。男性内在在自然中，呈现出各种攻击态，完全无法被女性主体接纳，这几乎是浪漫主义里天才式地对自然的占领的逆反。如果说死了东西都要归于自然，那么走入自然却搅起了如此腥风血雨的女人大概是自作自受吧？Indifference is key. 这大概是这部厌女之作的唯一认知。
最近两年最好的恐怖片 远好于同一题材的《隐形人》
这两年看了不少这种带有内在的主题探讨而外在表现选择恐怖/惊悚题材的影片，并且其主题大多为性别议题，似乎带有足够富有猎奇性质和视觉冲击力的类型元素能够很好地映射现实社会中女性面临的困境。
年度影片！
有点神秘，有点惊悚，有点爽。喜欢一些对男凝的反抗，杰西巴克利戏路越来越好了。
还行，最后男人套娃生男人真的牛皮。片子里展现的女性困境太多太露骨了，还可以更大胆
男人在生态里的寄生虫般存在 and 这片在letterboxd和豆瓣上的短评大趋势好不一样（。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
