Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
一个休斯敦孩子的“少年时代”和他的太空登月经历，没明显的故事线，但每个片段构成了六十年代末美国的生活风情画。很多彩蛋让不同年龄的观影者有身临其境的感觉。
他们那个年代的童年，丰富多彩，
“人的记忆就是这么奇妙 就算他睡着了 以后也会觉得亲眼见证了人类登陆月球” 小男孩因睡觉错过了登月直播 只好在脑中杜撰了一个自己登月的版本 后半段小男孩的登月狂想与真实登月录像的平行蒙太奇非常抓人 前半段是导演私心放入的美国60年代的日常生活图景 从生活百态到流行文化不一而足 动画的形式让整个观感非常舒服
另，真心希望每个人都能有自己的思考而不是被话语权主流剥夺了思考的能力。
出乎意料的真实感，有如回忆录般的旁白勾勒出美国60年代的社会与文化，同时也细致地描绘了南部城市孩子的少年生活写照，大概是“看情商正常的young sheldon出演阿甘正传”的感觉。后面阿波罗10号半与11号的登月经历交错剪辑得非常棒，站在stan的视角这段很动人，也喜欢最后睡着了没有看到“第一步”却又什么都经历了的处理方式。给编剧兼导演鼓掌👏🏻
真是温馨有趣的回忆。导演们都成批回童年找安慰了。发现他们60年代的童年，我们的80后应该有共鸣。同样都是动荡不安的年代，人还是上了月球，仰望星空还是有希望的。
这是林克莱特的少年太空梦，更像是为了弥补当年因为睡着错过直播的遗憾，文艺男也可以这么可爱啊哈哈，他在梦中见证了这一历史性时刻…
传承了导演一如既往的细腻表达 是目前最打动我的一版关于登月的电影 好像我也回到了1960s那个充满希望和科幻的年代生活了一段日子
3.5/5 看看别人的60年代，再看看我们的60年代。
从开始到快结束，完全没有感觉到一丝希望，偶尔有“好起来了”这样的感觉，接踵而至的总会是现实更残忍的冲击。
现在看，真的太震撼了，战争其实离我们很近，我们应该感谢伟大的祖国，让我们能生活在和平年代！
完全是1.0的战争片拍法，出现的这个时间点也很微妙，片头大胆的公司LOGO倒是印象深刻
有助于理解战争不是某一瞬间的决定，而是积怨已久的爆发。
超喜欢！里面的复古元素真的太棒了 一家人 一个人的童年 真好
somehow ironic, somehow nihilistic, yet still beautiful and new
作为电影来说一般，宣传需要更大。前面磨磨唧唧后面好些，但又马上随着毛子的离去戛然而止。假如没了解过相关背景，说实话看不懂。
喜欢背景能看到笔刷形状。一开始以为是讲小孩宇航员，看了30分钟发现是How To With John Wilson 60年代休斯顿版。多多少少总能代入一点家庭日常
2008年北京奥运会开幕式的那个晚上，我也没等到姚明举着国旗出场就睡着了。醒来后的我懊恼不已，觉得好像错过了什么很重大的事情。Richard Linklater一半讲琐碎童年，一半就在讲这件少年心事。年轻的孩童曾梦想着成为伟大的「参与者」，可殊不知我们甚至没能成为伟大的「见证者」。登月着陆的时刻我们在游乐园玩耍，留下足迹的时刻我们早困倦不已。但日后成年的我们再提及这段过往，这份「不在场」的念想其实又帮助我们实现了「在场」，某种形式上。
片中的男孩让我想到生活在相同年代、同样梦想成为宇航员的小阿方索•卡隆。而与本片导演的童年——有关航天的一切如此触手可及——不同，卡隆小时候的目之所及不会有飞船和太空，因而他的宇航员梦更像一个遥不可及的幻想。而正是这种与生活实际的距离感赋予了这个梦以美感，让《罗马》中那个穿上宇航服在林间漫步的孩子获得了一种超脱日常生活的意义。反观在本片中这样的环境里，登月一定算是个非常平庸的梦想吧。但就算如此，孩子的梦想总笼罩着一层纯真的光晕，它只是因为向往太空，与任何宏大的功利目标无关，那么在这个意义上，这梦想也显得无比可爱。
虽然情节上没有什么波澜起伏，但片子将那时候的年代感表现得很好。3.5分吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
