Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
Standardized Netfilx Production
这种音画美的动画适合在电影院看效果会更佳，剧情整体俗套，海兽与猎人的世界观、格局还没打开完就匆匆结束了，这或许是这部动画电影最掉分的地方，卡尔·厄本打完祖国人开始打海兽了。
《白鲸》+《驯龙高手》。虽然结局俗套，但是也不妨碍它成为近几年最舒适的长篇CG动画。
7分。对这种加勒比风帆战舰的时代完全没有抵抗力呢~~~前半段完全是白鲸的故事设计，各种战斗设计还有画面效果都非常得我心，和披甲兽那段真得大赞~~但后半段是什么鬼？？一个从小长大的猎人，一个孤儿院跑出来的小孩，唯一的共同点就是父母都被海兽干掉了，最后竟然这么默契地就和解了？女孩子一通嘴炮直接把全国的人说动了？？我就好奇最后那将军知道自己在帝王号上的兄弟是被焰魔干掉的，会不会后悔没开炮。。。整个电影作为儿童片看看还是可以的，但太过宏大的主题就这么被无视还是有点可惜啊。
可能因为先看了豆瓣点评再去看的，所以感觉比7分是要高的，完成度不错，故事情节再最后的小女孩演讲前其实也算饱满，就是最后面想不到怎么收场又用一场演讲来结束剧情的确有点审美疲劳了。
驯海怪高手（zzzq版）。论篡改历史，印第安人表示昂撒很淦。
简简单单，适合和家人一起看的温馨治愈动画。
这也太扯了这剧情 而且这不就是海洋版驯龙高手吗，长的都那么像
塑胶海兽还挺好看 做成手办会很好卖 故事整体完成度挺高的 开头的海战还给我感动了一把 燃起来了 除了结尾明显过于理想化之外 其他值得一看
First half is pretty good. Then goes to cliche boring rubbish.
海上版《驯龙高手》，一开始看着人类穷追不舍地追杀Red就觉得很莫名其妙：人家在自己的地盘（海洋）生活，人类自己跑去人家家里攻击人家，事后还把锅全扣人家头上，真是服了。结果看到后面…发现果然就是这样。
先不说剧情，画面光影材质上太牛了，那水的质感，岛屿植物，技术太强了，剧情上嘛，就是低配驯龙高手，不过还是期待看到更多冒险动画电影。
还行…开头太老套我差点睡过去。全场亮点在最后小女孩的讲话。其他感觉都在别的电影里看过了。
看的生肉版，好在情节简单算是大概看明白了。画面还不错，但结局有点太简单，没有更深刻的东西。
一开始让我想到了泰山，大海，浮木
善良的人才会有的作品。喜欢动物的观众可能更有共鸣一些
倒叙的方式细腻的讲述了一个普通人平凡的半生 很多人能从男主的故事看到自己的影子 最后男主站在和初恋初次见面商场门口泪流满面的样子 像极那了谁站在那个十字路口时的模样
如果说宫崎骏为大人们谱写童话，那么为什么又要在这种欧美童话寻求现实意义呢？本片人物细节动作叹为观止，各色人等“表演”栩栩如生，虽然强行嘴炮He➕zzzq，但瑕不掩瑜。
画面多好看剧情就多单薄，小红小蓝小黄很可爱，没了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
