A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
演员演到崩溃边缘的演技太好了。
虽然不如麦子叔的绿屠夫，但也算极尽讽刺了。素食，真主，黑人，女性基本黑了个遍。保持政治不正确才是人间乐趣。
题材很暗黑，但拍的很sunshine，这很法国。没什么出挑的优点，黑色幽默什么的也谈不到，不过没大毛病，随便看看就还行吧。
用一种极端对付另一种极端：吃掉纯素食主义者。
看过的第三部有吃人肉的情节的法国电影了，法国人对吃人肉是有什么特殊情结吗？整体其实还不错，挺有意思的
相对于原著进行了一些改动，交叉叙事、构图、场景设置都不错。情节依托色彩、物、语言和隐喻在现实和过去之间来回穿梭，建立联系的同时又相互区别，比如代表Nazi的黑色军服和船员的白色工服作为可辨认的徽记（同时也是强制-自由的极与极）。前一半铺垫得有点过长，有点可惜的是象棋被摧毁之后那段，个人感觉还差点意思，自我分裂还可以更痛苦更有张力，经过一对赤裸-尊严之人反而有了些审美化的倾向。最后船上对弈的视觉语言很有意思，浮现的回忆在电影里以环绕形态重新在场。结局……怎么还有点乐观主义😂总体而言，本来就很有畅销书味道的茨威格，被改编成了更符合刻板印象的主流大众电影，这一点还是让我挺咯噔的。
超级黑素食主义者哈哈哈 导演是不是被他们得罪过啊这剧情已经把素食者几乎放在人类对立面了 PS：字幕组ballball了别再自作聪明在字幕里玩梗了 差点让人看不明白了
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈 神户素食者 好久没这么开了 荒诞不羁 三月阴霾尽扫 我就说么 法国喜剧 才是我的本命喜剧 不仅有离奇的眼神 蒙太奇搭配小动作 没头脑与不高兴的阶级对立 作者借着蔬菜圣母们的嘴脸 吐槽值直接拉满 对不起了 即使是那么可怜的小熊的一生 我依然笑出了声儿
改编得已经很出色了，把主人公狱中和船上的两段经历交织得很精彩。但是结尾，还是原著更有张力。
很有意思的黑色幽默+讽刺电影，结尾太仓促扣一星。
茨威格最大的理想是重拾世界的尊严。而至此为何美国如此另欧陆人神往也找到了理由，他们试图相信那里是昨日的世界的复刻，是新建的辉煌之城特洛伊。
就这能有7分？一部并不能让人发笑的喜剧,2星！
自从吃了人肉，腰也不酸了，腿也不疼了，连性生活都和谐了
讲个笑话吧，法国猪肉牛肉的消费关系到巴西雨林的存亡，所以法国人决定为了拯救巴西雨林改吃素食主义者，完美逻辑！
1 恐怖片拍出了点喜剧片的感觉；2 人肉类道具做的挺好的，很有质感；3 结构不错，一是纪录片和现实互相关联，二是还埋伏着情感线，夫妻情，与贱夫妇的交往等的情感变化都玩的相当不错。推荐吧，难得有趣的恐怖片。
如果你做一件事情是为了娱乐，往往不能做到极致。如果是为了生存，那么可能会与极致有一面之缘。如果是为了物质的存活，或许能够接近极致，至少不会太远。如果是为了精神的存活，那么就是无法超越的极致。在这种情况下，天赋能够贡献的能量已经少到可怕。
我怎么觉得正好对应当下的世界局势呢？故事完整，节奏不错，少量的血腥镜头也足够让头皮发麻，比黄秋生高级多了。 6.9/2168 短评835条 %49/43/8 【IMDb6.7/949 全球票房187.75万美元】
法国人拍喜剧片确实挺好看的(๑•.•๑)，虽然看的是解说，不过后面我会找原片来看一看，体验一下的
浪漫轻喜剧哈哈哈 有几个地方真的好好笑 les pauvres huîtres
哈哈哈挺好玩的，就是结尾太那啥了，直接杀出一片天地不好吗，再说这才挣了多少钱
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
