Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
比起前几部是进步的，梗挤得不是那么尬了，念书感也有所减少。但影片慢到令人想拥有一键倍速的功能。张宥浩是章宇干净少年版吗？
电影讲了很多故事，到最后你会发现它其实什么都没有讲，韩寒的电影一直都是同一部电影，看多了也便觉得没什么意思。仅有的幽默也是几位演员与生俱来的幽默气质。
在孤独中相逢又在重逢中失去
还是一如既往贯彻着韩式风格，对于个人而言，还是喜欢的，毕竟曾经也算是半个文艺青年。
1.几个幽默的点是否和全片氛围不太契合？2.影片前段，床上有本书，欧亨利的《麦琪的礼物》，预示了结尾。3.刘昊然的小胡子，致敬了《从海底出击》中的胡子自然生长。
韩寒讲不好这个故事，整体也很像青春文学。电影上韩寒没有天赋。
飞越珠江车手 尹建豪 如果我是韩寒就把这几个字打在演员表最上面
尹正死前部分完全是俩男人纯爱电影，飙车见家人，贷款发工资追求，在昏暗的灯光下壁咚着说我好喜欢你，跃进海洋中熄灭生命之火。尹正是不是抢了很多女主的部分啊？这女主演技声音都很差。女主如果是马思纯这种要死不活的文艺调调，或者张子枫跟刘源一起营销，或是赵今麦这种充满活力的，电影会变得好看。
如果刘昊然换成四字弟弟也许效果会更好一些，因为刘昊然在《唐探》里每次都可以化险为夷的乐观已经根深蒂固，让他一下子进入悲情有点不习惯。刘浩存只能说中规中矩，也不至于那么差，沈腾、尹正加分。青春随风而逝，不留下一点印迹，但是我们都曾如此义无反顾
我竟然能听出来片尾曲是雷光夏的声音。结局是什么？
四海
宛如儿戏，婆婆妈妈。万青的《山雀》加一星。
凉了白开水，抛开现实也算“奇幻”童话故事了
还行 没那么差啊…只不过都死的结局有点强行…
与《奇迹》最后所有人都收获成功恰恰相反，这部电影的结局是相当悲惨的，物是人非，车损人亡，生活仿佛没有了一切希望，一切本该向好的方向发展的事情，全都搞砸了，看完只有无尽的压抑。
愿你以后住的酒店，都是含早的…
一个类似雄师少年的故事，韩寒骨子里还是个尖酸的反对派，想用悲剧的方式说一个喜剧，只是把悲剧的一面无限放大了。
拜托韩老师你不要再拍这类片了，拍一个烂一个。
其次是整部电影对于气氛的营造：南澳流动的海水、广州流动的霓虹，突然起雾的海面上驶来的大船和《后会无期》里升空的火箭一样，是一根刺。
我年轻的时候，闯荡四海。年纪大了，四海为家。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
