-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
22向着地球飞去的时候有点不敢看，生怕它降落在某个可怕的国度，对，就是内个……
刚来日本头两年，我就像是“游魂”，我也不知道自己在干嘛，拼命找所谓的“人生目标”。
本以为是想讲人要寻找追求自己的梦想，而我几乎陷入了22一样的惶恐，惊喜于电影最后带给我一个不一样的答案 — maybe life’s purpose is just living it. 有时候人生也许并不像计划般的一往无前，这时候随性而为jazzing it也并无不可，天空中飘过的云，风中缓缓飘下的叶子，温暖的阳光，美味的披萨，就是生活的sparks，这也是让我撑过今年的sparks.
也太无聊了吧 能不能用动画做点别的拿出点新东西啊
第一感觉更喜欢寻梦环游记的和更喜欢心灵奇旅的会是两种人。
朋友，没有五险一金还996魂能不丢吗？就算重启无限次过一会儿还是一样啊。
（９／１０）就像《头脑特攻队》，是一个没有反派的故事。
看过并没有太惊喜，这种找寻生命意义的片子还是最喜欢《电锯惊魂》，直接、有效、不矫情 :DDD 喜欢的部分：毕加索立体主义风格的量子集合大神、对达利的致敬、通过线条获得信息和转移自己的认真会计、无论怎样的世界都存在的灰色地带、在医院里用猫唤回垂死之人。（杜比音效。3D）
整个电影片子其实很舒服，但是提出了一个非常大的议题，就是我们到底为什么活着？不过坦白说，直到看完的最后一刻也没有找到一个特别明确的答案，只是给了一句活在当下。这一点多多少少的有点拉分。当然对我来说最值得吐槽的大概就是 假3D，只有字幕，和片头和片尾是3D的这种骚操作吧！结尾的那段一命换一命，虽然是在意料之内，可是我觉得应该还有更巧妙的一些手法来处理这件事情吧。总觉得这个走向有点偷懒。最后如果是家长带小朋友去看的话，请不要在电影院里面拍照，真的是很烦人。
就是我以为可以爵士乐听个爽，结果喝了一碗纯正老母亲热鸡汤
在这部电影里面，以对话的形式向观众表达了“生活的意义”，还有“人生的目的”，太直白了，而且没有新意（或者直接点说“老套”？）╮（╯＿╰）╭
可能预期太高，设定又太像coco+inside out，就没有很惊喜，但故事还是很打动我，应该是最适合治愈2020年的电影了吧
享受生活，做个平凡的人也没关系。
四颗星给技术吧。怎么港，皮克斯其实已经很难打动我了。近十年的12部作品，除了Coco，其他都乏善可陈，好几部还是无聊的狗尾续貂之作，被人捧上天的Inside out在我看来也是gender-roled stereotypical crap. 不过这部至少告诉人们人生的意义是活在当下，就好像被生活压得喘不过气的现代人还有空去思考人生的意义一样，有空纠结这个不如多赚点钱，money is everything. 人生本来也没啥意义，做自己喜欢的事就是意义，就算我知道这件事没意义，但我高兴，这就是意义。我都快不认识意义这两个字了……
其实皮克斯告诉我们的不是追求梦想是最不重要的，而是在追求梦想的同时，别忘了生活中的点点滴滴，那些也是生活的真谛。2020.12.31新业坊
非常感动！但是吐槽基金经理那里我忍不住看了看我的基金收益。
会忽略到了投胎前还要受到各种政届名人的教导的设定（虽然他们也没成功让一个小孩投胎）；
一碗新意满满的鸡汤，看似俗套但内涵非常成人向。本片颇具哲学意义，皮克斯用天才的想象力进行了一场灵魂与肉体的思考。
不抱目的地活着可能才是活着的意义。
“灵魂”这一更为抽象的东西比“情绪”更难掌控，更别说用别具一格的想象力将其具象化和拟人化，虽然本片相比头脑少了一些更为严谨的科学理论依据，有太多纯粹的奇幻内容，但它所带来的“心灵世界”还是把我震撼到了。其实看完后我才发现电影并没有在“灵魂”这一抽象的东西上深入的大做文章，到头来，也只是在传递着享受当下生活的老生常谈的理念，但这个故事不得不说是很有说服力。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
