Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
嗯 就是产生愉悦感的片子，但是逻辑还有点不够彻底…比如怎么认出凶手的？以及一直女扮男装有啥意义…以及谁能告诉我场景在哪里？
凑合吧！为了男女主怎么也得追一个……但剧情就真的跟上一部挺重复的
要不是为了看木村……真的是无聊到睡着了……
ps最爱结尾第一幕的油画谁懂，绅士目送公主大步踏出门，开门的是两只小恶魔，可爱。
作为一个曾经的hotelman，看见那个办公环境，地下室霉油混合味儿在鼻子里呼之欲出。
我承认场景拍的很美，打斗的特效也够精致，我还有点喜欢Sprite这个角色。可惜，政治会让人昏头的。
达咩达咩，就莫名其妙一脸问号，各种线索埋得都太拙劣什么test什么手表看开头便知结尾。凶手又来得太强行，硬生生在结尾来了个说服力并不强的悲惨故事。。。酒店经营理念也颇为奇葩，杀人犯客人也是客人为了做好服务拒绝完全配合警方，那敢情别的客人的命就不如你的服务来得重要了？一群警察被犯人耍得团团转如果不是没有一个偶然因素干扰否则有俩人都会死在眼皮底下，最后竟然有脸喊话说大家都做得非常好？推理悬疑看的是逻辑，而不是把观众当傻子似的一个接一个的反转。
非常喜欢这种没有漫威英雄篇套路偏文艺偏哲思文戏的自然风景“科幻电影”，真的很文艺，没有大段的打斗套路，摄影都是自然主义的风格，没有过于对比色高饱和度和传统灯光的套路。角色设置也很反传统，完全是去英雄化的个人，但格局真的逃出了漫威那种自我感动的格局，格局太大了
大神依旧帅气。大神和麻酱的cp感不如大神和麻生。我也很想体验一把电影中的酒店服务。但是最好不要碰到警方行动。
难看到勉强撑过一小时后关注重点跑到一个讲跨年夜的电影在日本定档917还给我在那边新年快乐？
她爱他，他爱她，她爱他，她爱他，他爱她，他爱他，我愿称此片为漫威十年最烂。
派对场面够壕
非得找身高出类拔萃的麻酱和大神搭...你说你们到底安的什么心！
被“zz正确”裹挟的好莱坞，漫威突击投其所好，10个超级英雄，10个族裔背景，走马观花地群像塑造，没有一个留下深刻印象。漫威全盘布局的模式是以牺牲导演个人特色为前提，使之成为工业化流水线产品。漫威的控制欲和导演的掌控力注定无法复刻《沙丘》这样的成功案例，双方的妥协只能带来一个不协调的作品，像是扎导院线版《正义联盟》。
看过前作的表示对剧情已经完全无所谓了，就看看木村大神和各种熟面孔挺好，如果对悬疑推理有任何期待，那建议还是别浪费时间了，割裂感太重，甚至觉得扩充点剧情拍个SP短剧更合适
比第一部流畅，但也没有第一部的支线繁杂。虽然推理最后还是没什么波澜感觉，但整体不沉闷，节奏不错。（主要还是主演的可爱加分哈哈哈最后四人又站一起了笑死）
精彩纷呈。看这个电影的感觉就是日本气质好的演员真多啊。
2022.6.3@百度网盘 就是看看热闹，破案和犯案一样离奇
test就测一个人，另一个完全不考，是不是太随意了啊！
我：嫁给我吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
