Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
文戏武戏比例过于不均衡了，结尾复仇的高潮部分本应该细致又爽快，结果拍成了征兵宣传片。
多些武戏多好啊，俄罗斯飞机武器巨酷和震撼，可惜少了点。最后的煽情格局再高一点就完美了。
多它一个不多，少它一个不少型电影。请了好多大牌，却索然无味，一点新东西都没有啊！！
是个好电影，风暴之门的那种往日生活和现在的交叉镜头。拯救大尉这段，大尉拼死打电话才得到营救。武装直升机 特种部队 空军 海军 基本上能出动的基本都出动了。最终还是带着降落时被打死的中校回家了。
千万不要因为看了抖音剪辑就来看原片，你会后悔的～
忘了在哪看到一个评价：大数据分析出来的脚本和选角
那个孩子，那个民族，都为这个坚韧不屈的国家感到骄傲
最主要的是其中的情感。
除了最后的反击还看的让人有点热血沸腾之外 前面的什么家国情怀 不为金钱折腰 这种主旋律 几乎把我劝退
看了快半个小时还以为自己找错了电影，进度条拉到后边才发现没错，战斗民族拍电影文戏一如既往的拉垮，又硬又婆妈墨迹。
据说是当下地表最贵网大（12亿人民币成本），额·······也就·····很数据流，观众喜欢什么给什么也不是不行，就·····挺可惜这个预算了。
我看过的第1393部电影，《天空》我给6.5分。
没有想象中那么好吧，以为三巨头聚集会有不一样的碰撞，但集合起来1+1+1小于3了，死侍，黑亚当，神奇女侠，真要是这么整一出戏可能还会有不少看点的。只能算是合格的爆米花电影，该有的都有，盗宝，追车，枪战，动作，硬汉，美女，搞笑，一锅炖，看个刺激就好，结尾的反转的确意外了，没想到巨石强森最后会来这么一出，盖尔加朵这算是演了个反派吧，没想到和巨石是一对，应该和雷诺兹演CP，不过她在这部电影中没有神奇女侠让人惊艳了，女二的女警也不错。
6.8 比想象中还是好看些的。剧情简单大众这必然的，但是瑞安还是有点搞笑气氛配合强森。要知道我个人不是很喜欢强森，不过这部片子里搭配还不错。
插科打诨挺欢乐，环球冒险看点多。帅哥美女加硬汉，不如剧情走点心。
是个好电影，风暴之门的那种往日生活和现在的交叉镜头。拯救大尉这段，大尉拼死打电话才得到营救。武装直升机 特种部队 空军 海军 基本上能出动的基本都出动了。最终还是带着降落时被打死的中校回家了。
能理解奈飞做电影千金买马骨的诚意和野心，但他们也未免弄出来太多的马骨了。。。
不好不坏，大概是网飞出品好莱坞类型片平均水准。
动作片都能令人看睡着，也不知道是我太累还是它太难看:)
还不错的大盗片，盗窃的过程有些简单，而且结局有些太好猜了…暗示给的也太明显了…看到宴会跳舞的时候就基本可以确定了。看的时候总是会想到前阵子很喜欢的动画《大欺诈师》~也是这个题材也是网飞播的…看来网飞的数据没错…我的确喜欢这个类型的片子~
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
