Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
发生在另一个平行宇宙里的A24×Malick crossover...配乐还用了Arvo Pärt
从女人到男人再到孩童，她什么都是，但她又什么都不是，影片通过呈现身份焦虑，通过将镜头聚焦于文明与社会之外的一个不断变换身份的巫女，进而呈现一段在被诅咒的身躯下寻求自身之价值、位置及其存在意义，获得主体性认同的过程。
好在最后靠自己保护了自己的爱人
蛮喜欢这电影节奏的～虽然在厚重的80-90年代，历史太过沉重迂腐……但男男主角自然且随着剧情的缓缓深入～Follow to ours heart ~是演技和眼神的不作假加持～
相必也是无力至极
挺好的片子啊，有同性题材的罪案片，如果只想看谈情说爱那可以绕道了，故事悬疑感还不错。
但最烦恐怖片拍成文艺片了！难看！
同时旁白太尼玛多了，说白了，还是认为单纯那点碎片无法阐释想说的内容。
模糊故事的概念，放大视觉和心灵体验，最后打动人心的却还是故事，特别是老女巫的往事讲出来之后就完全抓住了悲剧的基调。前半部分的体验感抓不住人，幸亏几位演员演技都很好，很自然。(这根本不恐怖)
一定有两个男生时时刻刻都在一起
影片很容易让人进去，去体验剧情，感受人物的动态变化，推荐推荐观看！
我怕是我上辈子没烧够香，才沦落到看这种电影。
拍成30分钟的短片就好，108分钟实在是絮叨冗长。
一场行动，两场活动，数次见面，扭转了一切。
在我的观感里面，电影算是好看的。悬疑部分不烧脑，感情线略短但也算是递进式，男二选了个帅哥倒也合理解释了男主掰弯的前提，毕竟谁不喜欢好看的脸蛋呢。
“风信子”，多美的名字，却被命名一个如此残酷的行动，警察男主估计是双，最后为了救“小男友”不得不杀人，令人唏嘘。。。
看多了这个类型的电影真是emo...
作为谍战剧 不够有反转，作为感情剧，不够刻骨铭心
第一次看马其顿语的片，圣丹斯清新脱俗，一个身份一段新旅程，手持浅焦，（要用耳机听）声音设计很有趣，另有两首arvo part插曲，闹米拉帕斯也就十多分钟的戏（其他人也都差不多）
虽然有故事情节，但节表达方式和节奏实在喜欢不来
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
