Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
潜逃至韩国的朝鲜数学家隐名埋姓在一个高中校园做保安，如何辅导一名高中生的故事，最后不得已出面为高中生作证。硬生生的把一个剧情插入了政治因素，再透露了韩国教育的某些阴暗面。
怎么中间突然断截一样……前半段的风格蛮喜欢的
我想，我对数学，数字的一切热爱就是从高中被开始剥夺的吧。
对人性 对一些社会的现状诠释的太真实了 真实的让人脊背忍不住丝丝发凉 人之初性本善没错 但人终归是自私的 当你有机会有能力让自己甚至是家人摆脱泥沼时 又怎会再跳入深潭呢 即使牺牲的 放弃的 是初心 是原来的自我 是同在泥沼中挣扎的伙伴 又何妨呢？ 试问自己 又何尝能肯定不是马图斯呢 所以 不要愤怒 更不要假惺惺的站在道德制高点指手画脚 如果实在想不通 就权当做优胜劣汰物竞天择吧
当所有人都在漩涡里挣扎，所谓的自由只能是随波逐流，或者沉下去。
7个囚徒中唯一走出的被拉拢成新的剥削者，反抗的力量难以凝聚。导演或许在借用囚徒处境影射巴西社会困境，偏现实主义风格还是蛮喜欢的。
印象里崔岷植比较少的文人角色，虽然还是涉及朝韩关系的万年韩国电影梗…套路化的剧情设计，几乎每一步都是按部就班，缺少让人共情的闪光点。两个主角的情感变迁描述得潦草仓促。三颗星给数学家讲述对数学的爱时出现的几个小动画，以及那首用钢琴曲。
非常担忧崔老师会不会上着上着课，这小榔头、小斧子什么的就掏出来了 .........
是以前不曾想象过的世界，人性竟展露得淋漓尽致
剧情确实是老套的，毕竟是季风北面的，南棒子的一贯特色了……不过不得不说讲故事的能力还是有的，关键还讥讽了韩国的高雪制度，挺有意思……不过讥讽有啥用，无非是影视人的自娱自乐而已……
成绩与艺术，成绩是反映学习情况的好坏但并不是唯一的标准，艺术有多样性与启蒙性。
尽管拍得套路，但现实这么糟糕，谁不会被这个温暖又美好的故事感动呢，可能最近情绪也不太好，看得我眼泪哗哗。演员选得真好，新人特别可爱，崔岷植一出来我就不行了，永远可以相信崔岷植的表演，永远。
孤独扫地僧与孤独废材相互救赎的故事，偏流水线，些许刻意，稍欠真诚，也并不难看，孤独排斥陪伴却又渴望陪伴，缺的仅是同频
只会努力的人第二个放弃
6分，虽说整个脱北形象还是幻想居多，但已经不停留在苦大仇深的1.0时代了，开始融入类型片，哪怕套路。
7。#venezia78 Orizzonti Extra
印象最深刻的一句话：数学不是算数，数学是思考。重要的不是结果，而是思考的过程。
数学+巴赫+乌龟的元素组合，合理怀疑编剧/导演是侯世达GEB书迷。
白老头也一样是囚徒，一个口哨就证明了。每个人都是囚徒，能力强些的还有机会给你选是否升一级
南北韩政治情节开始就有点看不下去了 需要休息
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
