Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
看前半部分只想骂人，第一次转折觉得还行，后面复仇部分拉低了整体的分数。男朋友即便是被人害死的，也掩盖不了婊女主的事实，所以复仇看起来并没有什么劲。
我被喂了一个半小时爆好吃的冰激凌味的屎……说真的，我看得眉头直皱，但g5主角每个人设都很讨喜，一个小马给一个星吧就）
最后魔法复现时我竟然流泪了
红色那只公马的角色塑造得不行啊，动机设计的不明确。到底是正派还是反派，让人觉得很模糊。三个种族纷争的动机也设计得不够清晰。几只小马里面，除了紫色独角兽的性格有点像萍琪，其他的都不太鲜明。跟G4相比，差得太远了，这个片子的情节和设定设计的比较简单，比较低幼化。
一个成年男孩看小马宝莉眼睛看红了。
作为g5的开篇来说已经近乎完美了，精心打磨过的致敬和音乐感动到我了，虽然剧情还是弱了点，但也不算拉胯，4星吧。
还是好想哭啊
前边当成色情片看的，没想到后边是个悬疑片。不知道女生看的时候是不是也想和那个摄影师来一下，就像女主第一次偷窥时候那个不自觉的手部动作一样：）
剧情上，虽说没有以前电影版的出彩，但是丝毫不无聊，代入感很强
为了想选题看的，中规中矩。想劝出版社不要做太多或者太贵的产品了，火不了的，卖不掉的……
今天陪孩子参加了《小马宝莉：新世代》首映，暑假过去一半，第二次带宝贝看电影。
带女儿合家欢。总感觉电影比剧集差。
超喜欢izzy 的性格，结局太老套了，略失望
低开高走的故事，一个敷衍陈旧的开头，越到后面越好看。其实都是老得不能再老的套路，简单得不能再简单的结构，但是竟然有点惊喜。这电影有故意的复古，有一种褒义的、故意的“肤浅”。
女主是个金发天真妹，她被诱惑了，可以理解，但没想到还有反转，所以品质就上了一个台阶。
虞书欣配音配的太可爱了😭😭😭😭😭😭心都化了
昨天带孩子去电影院看的。还不如平时看的小马谷好玩。孩子不爱看
🌟 推荐😊 演技🌅 画面🎉闪光点😂 笑点
这个结局让我没想到……
2021.09.25 看预告片的时候发现自己比预想中更容易接受，与G4相比风格变了很多，之间的衔接很棒，也算是有了一个交代吧。不知道是否因为时间限制导致故事结束得有些草率，不过问题不大。结尾有G4的味道，也让我落泪了……很期待他们之后的故事。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
