剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 渠惠丽 5小时前 :

    标准奥斯卡电影,buff比较满,克制的煽情技巧都在观影中被预先猜到了(比如音乐会上那段静音),但好在情感真挚不做作,观感尚佳。

  • 杉柔 7小时前 :

    因为后来的封城MIFF估计也落花流水了 自己在网上找到资源看了 3.5/5 很流水线的主旋律电影呀 和佛罗里达乐园差太多了 | MIFF排了但我买不着票 哭了

  • 柔彤彤 1小时前 :

    想起大学参加合唱团,选修上音乐课去看美女老师的时光,美女老师让我帮她登记成绩,结果忙着期末复习没空呜呜。原来女主妈妈是奥斯卡第一位聋哑人女主玛丽玛特琳。

  • 酆峻熙 0小时前 :

    歌曲很好听 改编的本土化很成功 照着法版走的 没有了法式幽默的剧情加强了一份无力感 就是没什么突破的地方

  • 锁凝阳 0小时前 :

    面试上的手语,父亲用自己的方式感受女儿的歌声。。这泪点真是一波接一波。。看这片我用掉不少纸巾。。

  • 汲梦易 6小时前 :

    每一个选择背后都是家人的支持,每一个拥抱背后都有大家的互相牺牲。

  • 祁培轩 7小时前 :

    如果中国翻拍最适合唱哪首歌呢,《隐形的翅膀》?

  • 梅昕 5小时前 :

    这不就是《贝利叶一家》🐴?

  • 锺离海逸 2小时前 :

    翻拍自法国电影《贝利叶一家》,记着要去看。

  • 褚雅柔 6小时前 :

    【A+】

  • 盛浩邈 7小时前 :

    怎么说呢,片子太普通了,但是我哭了次。一次是爸爸用手抚摸嗓音感受唱歌的声音,一次是手语翻译,一次是聋哑父亲说出“go”。拍的流畅,因此多给一星

  • 萱瑶 1小时前 :

    3.5星,煽情是循序渐进有故事基础的煽情,不是一锤子升格糊脸那种劣质煽情,唱得也挺不错,反正歌比《倒数时刻》好听多了。一家子聋哑人和唱歌女孩的设定太聪明了,是谁这么小机灵鬼,想出这一招。尤其是导演对聋哑人视角的使用,极其克制,只在小高潮运用过一次长时间的,整个礼堂的人都在听鲁比唱歌,但是她的家人听不到,那一段无声切换冲击力拉满。沙漠来学习,看看人家怎么拍的,你拍得是什么鬼?

  • 郗才捷 3小时前 :

    鸡汤片真好看,每个人物、节奏都无比精准、催泪

  • 楠瑶 3小时前 :

    没有声音只有手势却充满表情张力的几幕都真实得令人讶异——我不觉得这是一部老套的换了个描写对象的大团圆。能够对一个特殊群体的特殊、尴尬、融入大群体时的微妙情绪描写得如此细致入微,且没有忘记殊途同归的共鸣,这在艺术作品中是非常困难的事。少女的困窘在影片中被放大成一个家庭的负担,但与此同时她的牺牲又有不被理解的一面(来自哥哥的那句“有你之前我们都很好”),影片中无数诸如此类的转折令人湿着眼眶看完全场。还有少年时期的恋情,女孩的倾心、自卑、坦然——我不觉得结局是乏味的大团圆,我觉得它圆了我的一个从未靠近过的梦。

  • 首初彤 3小时前 :

    影片中最讓我動容的場景是最後女主參加伯克利入學面試的時候一邊唱歌一邊打著手語,她讓聽不見聲音的家人們也感受到了這首歌。有時候我們正常人真的很難去體會那些身體有缺陷的人的痛苦,想到之前看到的一句話,你以為的失明是閉上雙眼,可真正的失明是當你閉上一邊眼睛時所感受到的無助才是視障人士眼中的世界。所以當在禮堂里所有觀眾欣賞著二重唱而鏡頭換到父親視角的時候,我們才能體會到那種靜謐到極致的孤獨。可上天有時就是不公平的,所以這些苦楚都要自己吞下。電影的質量其實還是挺不錯的,但是拿小金人還是會缺少信服力。

  • 羿寄南 5小时前 :

    身体的缺陷,意味了社会欲望的删减,让夫妻更加恩爱,让这家人更加亲密。把事业与梦想在内的社会关系讲述得略显理想化,对人物情感的表达却又极其真实。女性镜头下的爱与家庭,温暖而坚实。

  • 柔玥 7小时前 :

    最喜欢的是面试时唱着唱着就打起了手语,已经无所谓结果,只想把这首歌唱给家人听。结局挺理想化,歌不错。

  • 鸿昭 6小时前 :

    虽然温情工整演技自然,但很意外,这电影居然可以拿奥斯卡最佳。

  • 蓝孤兰 7小时前 :

    阳光明媚,舒服得一塌糊涂的那种电影,每一个角色都无比可爱,就连他们家住的房子我都很喜欢。

  • 福腾 6小时前 :

    单薄的人物、完全割裂的两条主线拼出所谓“关怀”,实际上把聋人父母哥哥换成《乡下人的悲歌》中的妈妈外婆也完全不会影响剧情,最重要的无声戏也是直接从原版搬来的。而且,随便参加个合唱社就能考上伯克利,音乐学院不用考基础乐理的吗……?

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved