A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
衰老是很悲惨的事情，有没有家人都很悲惨
烂到匪夷所思，这么俗穿地心的梗怎么真的敢拿来用，尤其是李栋旭那条线臭死了，这酒店有林允儿韩智敏还找那个小清洁？
能大胆说出口的喜欢，能收到回应的喜欢，真好啊。新年快乐。
少年组的恋爱最心动，其次是老年组，一把年纪了还是很有少女感
姜河那咋这么搞笑，每年过年这样的电影来一部
7.4 1.2 儘管早已2022過了一個多月，看這部電影的時候，仍然有跟著一起倒數跨年的感動，就帶著與劇情一樣的不可能去挑戰接下來認為不可能辦的到的事情吧!
韩国版《真爱至上》，但故事线还是太贺岁片了，为了温暖而温暖。制作也有些粗糙，绿幕也比较明显。
平遥首映 两星半 主线混乱 人物塑造也不够成熟 加油吧
因为在b站被安利了元珍雅和李东旭那段 不过真的看完电影就大概有一种曼哈顿女佣的错觉～别的不说 徐康俊（李江）唱的那首歌叫什么名字～
三星半，放低期待去看，还挺轻松可爱的。（有些镜头真的很漂亮）
还不错，看到主演我就非常非常期待了，整体偏冗长，但还看得下去，有很多欧美电影的影子，但是大咖们聚在一起演这点已经弥补作品的不足了，是跨年的作品，不想挑太多缺点，还是有感动温暖的片段，挺好的，如果可以再多点欢乐和笑点，更能开心和温暖的开始新的一年。
来的火车上刚好读了蔡崇达的皮囊，结合电影，觉得这一哭一笑的内里情绪实在很像。通俗现实题材，可以预想到故事发展，但生命尊严问题，等待死亡的困境和无力感还是很打动人。带给我自身的思考也更多一些，要对父母更好一些。
这剧情让我想起来假日暖洋洋。然而还没有假日暖洋洋拍的好。
第一次体验这样的放映会。片子较优秀电影的确有些差距，缺少深度也缺少艺术性。只能说真的很真实，很真实，真实到你觉得这的确会发生在你的生活中一样，所以我的确也思考了很多。影片放完后，听导演介绍了很多，很触动我的一点是，他在创作过程中放了很多自己的情结，在我看来对他而言这像是圆梦一般。这一点我真的很羡慕了，很羡慕他能有这样表达自己的方式与机会。今年的生日愿望就是希望有机会为我似乎纷乱繁杂的世界找到一个入口以及出口，我很好奇会是什么样子。好像最近很多的事情都无意识在朝向这个方向了，以及在yx的启发下，好像我似乎有机会摸到一点点新世界的大门了，我很期待。
有不少经典黑帮片的影子，开头的室内长镜头很厉害，但中间连贯性感觉不好。
【乌克兰】不吝于对暴力的展示，但几次之后，就觉得稍显过度，偏失重点。而男主随着行为所展示的力图救赎与内心交战，这种更为深刻的角色研究相比下却不够。出色的大概还是对时代背景的还原。
2.5/5.0
好温暖好感动好想爱 新年第一天能看到这么美好的电影真是太好了♥️
学真爱至上、有顶天饭店学的不成功，看到接近一半开始频频走神玩手机，不过新年期间也可以一看。
去年的同类型是新年前夜 说实话真爱至上也算不上什么影史经典 但确实是比较符合节日氛围的群像电影 hgr怎么这么热衷于打造本土版真爱至上？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
