A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
喜欢欧阳万城，演的不错。不容易啊，亚裔普通男性和白人女性的浪漫喜剧电影，也算是创造历史了。
所有群舞片段，运镜、调度、剪辑最大限度地展示出了它们所能够释放的魔力，这真的已经是商业电影视听享受的天花板了。丽塔莫雷诺踢开强奸者的彩蛋，比所有漫威彩蛋加起来都燃。小quiz：那些说照抄了原版电影的人哪里有毛病：A眼睛，B耳朵，C脑袋，D钝角
B
所有群舞片段，运镜、调度、剪辑最大限度地展示出了它们所能够释放的魔力，这真的已经是商业电影视听享受的天花板了。丽塔莫雷诺踢开强奸者的彩蛋，比所有漫威彩蛋加起来都燃。小quiz：那些说照抄了原版电影的人哪里有毛病：A眼睛，B耳朵，C脑袋，D钝角
一想到女主现实中的男朋友是肖恩就非常的羡慕妒忌恨
太长太啰嗦了，要不是朋友请我看的PGA展映我绝对撑不下去。关键是这个片子有拍出来的必要吗？本身原作就是把罗密欧与朱丽叶一键复制到纽约，改编基础上再改编，可是全无创新。罗朱的故事放在那个时代背景下是可以成立的，这个则剧情牵强、匪夷所思。灯光生硬无比，gaffer扣鸡腿。论娱乐性则比In the Heights差太多。
没有太多历史文化背景的美国人，把莎士比亚怕的文字抄来改编成自己的蹩脚歌舞剧，并奉为经典，莎士比亚是会不开心的。
做旧感很强的布景，主角毫无辨识度的脸和做作尴尬的表演，歌舞调度杂乱无新意无美感，说白了就是难听又难看，耍猴戏一样煎熬的两个半小时，比61版差了不止一星半点，重拍个什么劲儿呢
最后一部奥斯卡最佳影片题目，冲着斯皮尔伯格看的，太难看了，几次硬着头皮看完，太失望了。本来就不喜欢歌舞片，这部跟那些经典更是不能比。
歌舞剧蛮老套的，不过光影动作色彩都是非常教科书般的。种族主义是好莱坞拍摄永恒的主题
这本来是个借爱情悲剧讲述种族歧视的作品？但我实在受不了恋爱脑蠢逼男女主...只要他俩的戏份都看得我难受的坐立难安。还有简直塑料兄妹情。。。确定是亲哥？你哥刚被他捅死，立马跟人家滚床单了？？？!!!我特么。。。然后嫂子在门外伤心欲绝想跟你谈谈，俩人还在窗口缠绵，嫂子推开门看到真的是心都凉了，我都想冲过去一个大嘴巴子抽死这对狗男女。。。嫂子后面还帮忙去传话，差点被强，好屈辱好心疼她，所以我看到她撒谎间接害死男主我不仅不难过反而觉得很爽，该!chino咋不把女主也干掉，史上最讨人厌男女主。。。
说真的虽然电车男+真爱至上真有让人感动，励志的的地方，但是！明明是猥琐男先骗人的为什么女生最后要这样卑微道歉啊，太假了，现实里根本不会有这样的情节。还有，欧阳万成真的真的不适合做恋爱片的男主和那么漂亮的女主。。还是觉得很违和。在最后的吻戏的地方，忍不住按下暂停想跳过那一趴。。
古典而精彩的电影，前半段披着罗密欧与朱丽叶的套子，在高潮时故事走向了自己的结局。
有没有一种可能，音乐剧改编电影就按电影语言来拍，而不是做成大荧幕版音乐剧？（P.S.罗密欧和朱丽叶还是滋养了很多人）
2.5，2022.01.22@西門國賓鉅幕
最后一部奥斯卡最佳影片题目，冲着斯皮尔伯格看的，太难看了，几次硬着头皮看完，太失望了。本来就不喜欢歌舞片，这部跟那些经典更是不能比。
又是无法理解安塞尔埃尔高特能演男主的一天呢~
为了Jimmy弟弟能多接点戏，脚趾抠着地给四星！这化学反应是一点也没有了，但是圣诞电影要啥化学反应！
开头让我痛苦地回忆起为啥老版电影看了5min就看不下去了。真的没必要如此忠诚地还原舞台并告诉大家我们这是musical…后面倒是还好，虽然剧情狗屎但整体是电影而不是舞台的翻版。说是说罗朱，其实就是老美习惯性做着自己国家民族大融合的梦。三星给镜头调度和歌曲，还有女主唱得真是很不错。ansel就，不开静音是我最后的宽容。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
