The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
精致的室内装饰但没好好地利用这些空间优势，整体给我的感觉就是有足够的资金，但导演水平有限。
Overrated. Nice cinematography tho.
对第一部Candyman的继承和诠释很棒，乃至有点儿刻板……那些吐槽本片嫌弃黑人影人反复讲述种族问题的评论，恰为电影的核心主题“黑人苦痛被消声只能化为candyman的符号”做了绝佳注脚：冲着恐怖电影来的观众是最糟的观众，他们只想被装神弄鬼吓到，却对真实的人间苦痛嗤之以鼻。
惊悚元素挺好的，但是主题太直白就拉低档次了。
影片结束后，电影院里边笑边喊"candyman"的声音此起彼伏，足见本片作为“恐怖片”来讲有多么失败。
看得云里雾里，政治议题和整个故事并没有形成很好的结合，就感觉导演很想煮一锅香喷喷的饭，但是一个半小时后打开一看发现水还是水，米还是米。
这两年的黑人平权恐怖片，从《逃出夺命镇》、《我们》、《异国阴宅》到这部，都是主题犀利且艺术造诣很高，烂大街的镜面影像依然用得惊艳，恰到好处地表达了身份认知和觉醒，几段皮影戏堪比《巴巴杜》，极大地渲染了悲怆与诡异氛围。这种完成度老司机们都不满意，原版到底是有多优秀。
D+ / 太急切地想要靠近乔丹·皮尔式的黑人政治隐喻恐怖类型片，但对于剧本的创意还欠打磨，反倒是隐喻过于急切，四人中亚裔感觉到危险率先跑掉的情节本身就是没有什么逻辑的生硬隐喻，更何况本来就是老版糖果人的续作。镜子的运用、摄像机视点的选择有有意思的地方，但太少。
看了个机翻版，加上全员黑人分不清谁是谁，酸爽……剧本废话太多，而且这种对着镜子召唤candyman的脑残操作也只有漂亮国人能玩儿的出来吧，最后也没解释变身侠和洞洞里养蜜蜂是家族能力还是咋地，不过蜜蜂人和皮影戏还挺出彩的，认真看完了ed，2.5，黑人们除了控诉还能整点别的么？
generational trauma这种事，也不是一时半会能讲完的，还是多讲讲吧，热了是好事。主角Anthony的形象还是塑造得弱了点，那个被女友扶不上墙又想要一口气的劲儿老感觉还差那么一点儿。
在观影的过程中，我以为这部电影在翻拍白夜行。但是慢慢的，我发现他其实只是想告诉你跨越阶级的爱情存在的机率微乎其微。一切更多自是一厢情愿的意淫而已。电影的质感很不错，可是剧情感觉不连贯，更像是灵光一现的感觉，而且电影最后那个男女主在阳台的片段应该算是幻想吧，不然太突兀了。
本片传承自92版Candyman，当初的Candyman是白人圣母，本片的candyman是圣母搭救的婴儿，长大成人，继承成为Candyman。
原来还有一些续集属性，我个人来讲非常喜欢这部电影，尤其是结局。
算是近期不错的电影了。虽然导演的视听差的一批，可以用莫名其妙乱炖一锅形容了。但是这片子的点子传承的真不错！会选题！这种故事的噱头就足够有趣。其次是白人记者那里的反转，让我看到了不一样的政治正确，让我看到了一种反思，挺特别的。结局不知道在讲啥子玩意，但总体分目前感觉偏低，起码六分应该有，所以我觉得它四星。
要说缺点，其实也有，但无法避免，如果没人敢照着念名字那就无法拍下去了，问题还是在William Burke为什么执意要抓住Anthony McCoy，为什么追杀Brianna Cartwright，没弄明白，我很喜欢影片的艺术感，镜头还有氛围，令大部分人失望的原因是因为不恐怖，剧本设计了许多杀人的桥段，而Anthony的主线故事描述的不够多，虽然我很喜欢前面的剧情，为了多点后面寻找答案的过程到如何转变可以删减，结束比较仓
对第一部Candyman的继承和诠释很棒，乃至有点儿刻板……那些吐槽本片嫌弃黑人影人反复讲述种族问题的评论，恰为电影的核心主题“黑人苦痛被消声只能化为candyman的符号”做了绝佳注脚：冲着恐怖电影来的观众是最糟的观众，他们只想被装神弄鬼吓到，却对真实的人间苦痛嗤之以鼻。
婴童从未在仇恨的火海余生，双手难以从狭隘的画布自由。贫民窟是以神之名打造的刑场，摩天大楼只是在此升高的墓碑；糖果人是以吾之血延续的圣经，后辈子孙难逃一脉相承的圈套。噬人的蜂巢是弱者的名目，折射的镜像是历史的冤录，色彩如浓墨泼洒，光影似利器切割，艺术的殿堂任由虚荣作祟，法律的后座永远等级分明。
就⋯shallow and boring⋯
两星半，非常的meh。中途还有点想睡觉。这么一对比我司的Them真的不要太好看。。。
5。观众被骗了。一部简单明了的黑白种族电影，相当无趣乏味无聊。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
