Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
4.5
不好的家庭 因为女儿的结婚得到了幸福美满 可爱轻松的家庭合欢剧 平淡的日子被爱与亲情重燃
还是第一部那个味道，可惜的是少了惊喜感，然而再抛弃了脑洞的惊喜感之后，剧情上就缺点意思了。
分数：63
就很“Mad Max”！不愧为土澳，土嗨土嗨的。
连续第二部克里斯派恩的片子，感觉故事还行，导演和剪辑有点问题，总是差点意思。查了一下坦迪牛顿今年50了，这身材保持的不容易！
(5/10)没看过1，先看2，这干瘪的剧情，脏兮兮的服道化，专挑荒郊野外、缺乏经费的布景…挺符合澳洲土狗电影的风格。
继续第一部的故事。但后面叙事有点小了。看到结尾，这意思是还有3啊。两部说的是僵尸比很多人类有人性多了的主题。其他的就打打杀杀就完事。还算精彩，风格依旧。
原来全天下有女儿的老爸都是一个样子，古板守旧、冥顽不化、装腔作势又死要面子。全身充斥着骄傲的「大男子主义」，开着土的掉渣的老爷车，总是会冷言冷语打破愉快的气氛，好像从来只会照顾自己的感受。但他们又极力隐藏着自己柔软的内心，投身于事业又深爱着妻子，小心翼翼的保护自己的家庭，并一成不变的守护着自己的所谓「传统」。同时，对于自己女儿埋藏心底的爱，他也从来没有变少过。这样的父亲不只在电影里，更像是在我们身边，因为我们的父亲都是这个样子。
第一部的兄妹俩属实是有点儿惨，各种被揍被打被炸，竟然最后还没死。又出现新能力，控制半变异人。整体还算可以，没有第一部完整和创新，都是比较套路的东西
紧张刺激，小成本爆冷佳作！类似疯狂麦克斯这种废土狂暴风，从头打到尾，好片
爸爸和妻子和女儿们和女婿和亲家冲突，和解…
最无脑的僵尸片，如此简单的剧情我竟然没看懂，佩服
里面四个老头打的什么牌？有点像麻将，但又不像
比第一部画质提升了不少，中间有点闷，结尾打地堡节奏很好，前期男主的小窝真的有创意，把光合燃料丧尸发挥到极致，物尽其用啊。反派死法有点狗血，能猜到的那种。不过立意不错，镜头语言也独具一格，牛啊
其实一般，只不过口吐黄气的新能源丧尸真的脑洞大开了😂
没看过1直接看的2，除了血浆，也没看到有啥剧情！就一个送货的有点像退伍兵，隔段时间咳嗽然后吃药片，一路上到处僵尸，直接就开打，末日了也不知他整天开的车去哪里加油！地堡里面另一伙，天天拿人做实验搞啥控制病毒的药片！那个女的居然还可以控制僵尸心灵，和地堡的光头研究砖家，一个操纵僵尸，一个操纵机器，最后来个心灵pk，你以为你是尤里啊！我勒个去，太扯巴子了，和釜山行等那种僵尸片简直是云泥之别！
这1，2间隔真久。。都快忘了上一部的剧情了。。。
烂片一个。男主真的就是个废物。产燃料和僵尸女脑控其他僵尸还挺有意思的。
哈哈哈哈轻喜剧消磨时间很不错 笑点也是有的～节奏不错 女主真的好好看啊
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
