Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
jlo最近宣传这电影真是拼了，铺天盖地的。这电影也真是不能再量身打造了，再加上bennifer的八卦真是太热闹了。这年头能看个新romcom真太不容易了，我稍稍吐槽一下好了。jlo和Owen wilson的化学反应其实还可以，但是太着重描述男主的普通和土了，搞得跟个老头似的。然后电影里面的social media元素太多了，真的，别在屏幕上放Instagram了求你了。
故事带有明显的种族议题，糖果人身上遗传着黑人对白人的恨意，但似乎需要有一定了解才能有所感触。
虽说陈腔滥调，但真的很久很久没看到一线明星纡尊降贵演这种小妞爱情电影了，而且观感挺舒服的，不像很多类型片非要凹大道理。几段舞曲出乎意料不会像有些电影拍成mv，jlo人设35有点夸张，不过竟然演出了小女生恋爱的娇俏感，大本功不可没啊
这么烂俗的电影我已经是看不下去了，不过soundtrack都好听到怀孕，jlo宝刀未老，绝对是人生偶像了
剧情的确很老套。但看着就是很舒服。让人甜甜的笑。四星鼓励！音乐很好听。很难想象女主已五十多岁了，容貌和身材都管理的很棒！而且气场依旧足够！
#1391【谷阿莫】他右手是鉤子身體像蜂窩，想召喚他，只需要對鏡子大喊五聲他的名字2021《糖果人》BV1bq4y1G7Rh 2021/10/21
感觉编剧很年轻也很水……
大明星×普普通通的数学老师单亲爸爸。主线剧情没什么特别。舞台表演好看，歌也不错
性转版摩登灰姑娘为啥还在给大美人配中年好人男子，凭什么成功女士就非得只注重内在。诺丁山至少给配了颜颠的Hugh Grant，就不能给个不知道自己帅但明显是大帅哥的nerd吗
都已经不计较剧情了但槽点真是多：1、为毛那个教画画的鲍勃·鲁斯老师形象会被用在这部电影里当刻板印象的黑人Gay的男友…2、感觉整部电影对艺术概念的解读都相当肤浅，无非就是千篇一律的当代商业美术馆展览场景，然后听这些“艺术家”们尬吹他们的商业作品和生意经，是全片最无聊的地方，而且基本组成了这部电影的大部分内容...3、看这部电影的目的无非就是看糖果人杀人，结果这些场景要么有前景遮挡物，要么是远景...然后就又回到2、上面了4、糖果人含量很低
下班和同事一起看的电影 虽然俗套 但是适合周五晚上wind down
Maluma虽然演技不行，和JLo的化学反应真的强，就在我几乎要相信男女主的感情时，麦迪逊广场演唱会一出来，张力十足！就这样了咋还难选男主呢……
PS密恐患者慎看！
我真的受不了这种恐怖片看成政治纪录片的东西，老老实实拍好恐怖片不好吗
以后好莱坞这种说教型种族烂片会越来越多。整个设定就不合逻辑。既然糖果人出现的根源是种族歧视，那杀那么多黑人干嘛呢？全片恐怖的地方只有密恐
本以为是一个新时代的《诺丁山》，结果看到一个颇为俗套，每个环节都浮在上面，接不到地气的爆米花娱乐片，娱乐效果够了，尤其配乐挺不错的，甚至让人推测是不是给专辑拍M V拍成电影了？可影片的内容本身还是走不到心里去
三星半，情人节就该看这种不带脑子深究的浪漫轻喜小甜剧啊，难道非要去烧脑才满足。52岁状态真好，美翻了！歌也都好好听~ Fun fact: 据说当年因为搜索JLo outfit人太多，于是才启发创造了Google image search.
山珍海味吃腻的明星换点青菜吃的半边人生活，反王子+平民女子的童话，姐妹站起来，女性当自强，夹带了不少女权私货，剧本工整精巧，节奏轻松愉快，光听歌也是一种享受了。
恐怖桥段 音乐摄影 剧情设计都还是不错的片子 怎么会沦落成6分以下？种族冲突问题一直存在 而因此造成的悲剧也比比皆是 影片对这方面的刻画直接浓烈且主观（也许有夸大或弱化）虽也有不少bug 但作为恐怖片来说也优于过半 试想当迫害一而再再而三的无端降临于己 能否淡然自若地讲述这个中悲愤
的确还比不上诺丁山。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
